CVE-2022-23806
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCurve.IsOnCurve in crypto/elliptic in Go before 1.16.14 and 1.17.x before 1.17.7 can incorrectly return true in situations with a big.Int value that is not a valid field element.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Curve.IsOnCurve function in Go's crypto/elliptic package incorrectly validates whether a point lies on an elliptic curve. The function can return true for big.Int values that are not valid field elements, potentially allowing attackers to bypass cryptographic validation checks. This affects all uses of elliptic curve cryptography where this validation function is consulted.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.16.14>= 1.17.0, < 1.17.7= 9.0all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Go version installedRun 'go version' to see the installed Go versionAffected if Version is less than 1.16.14, or greater than or equal to 1.17.0 but less than 1.17.7
-
Verify use of crypto/elliptic packageSearch codebase for 'import crypto/elliptic' or 'crypto/elliptic' statementsAffected if The crypto/elliptic package is imported and used in the application
-
Identify IsOnCurve function callsSearch code for calls to IsOnCurve method on Curve objectsAffected if Code calls Curve.IsOnCurve() to validate elliptic curve points
-
Check if application performs EC point operationsReview code for elliptic curve point parsing, decompression, or deserialization from external inputAffected if Application processes EC points from untrusted sources without additional validation
-
For NetApp products, identify the Go runtime versionCheck product documentation or runtime for the bundled Go versionAffected if NetApp product ships with vulnerable Go version (all versions listed are affected if using vulnerable Go)
-
On Debian 9.0 systems, check golang packageRun 'dpkg -l | grep golang' to see installed Go packagesAffected if Running Debian 9.0 with Go packages from that release
You are affected if your Go version is below 1.16.14 or between 1.17.0 and 1.17.7, and your code uses crypto/elliptic.IsOnCurve() to validate points from external sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.16.141.17.7
Upgrade Go to version 1.16.14 or 1.17.7 or later. Review any code paths that depend on Curve.IsOnCurve for proper security guarantees.
Go 1.16.14+ or Go 1.17.7+ (or latest stable 1.17.x/1.18+)
- Upgrade Go to version 1.16.14 or later, OR upgrade to version 1.17.7 or later
- If using a Go-based product (Beegfs Csi Driver, Cloud Insights Telegraf Agent, Kubernetes Monitoring Operator, Storagegrid), rebuild/reinstall the product with the fixed Go version to incorporate the crypto/elliptic patch
- For Debian Linux 9.0, apply the Debian security update that patches the Go package to a fixed version
- Verify the fix by testing that Curve.IsOnCurve correctly rejects invalid field elements
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,848.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-23806 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-23806 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data