CVE-2022-23820
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFailure to validate the AMD SMM communication buffer may allow an attacker to corrupt the SMRAM potentially leading to arbitrary code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a firmware-level vulnerability in AMD processors where the System Management Mode (SMM) communication buffer is not properly validated before use. This allows an attacker to corrupt the SMRAM (System Management RAM), which operates at the highest privilege level (ring -2), potentially achieving arbitrary code execution with complete system control.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= comboam4_pi_1.0.0.9= comboam4_v2_pi_1.2.0.8= comboam4_pi_1.0.0.9= comboam4_v2_pi_1.2.0.8= comboam4_pi_1.0.0.9= comboam4_v2_pi_1.2.0.8= comboam4_pi_1.0.0.9= comboam4_v2_pi_1.2.0.8= comboam4_pi_1.0.0.9= comboam4_v2_pi_1.2.0.8= comboam4_pi_1.0.0.9= comboam4_v2_pi_1.2.0.8= comboam4_pi_1.0.0.9= comboam4_v2_pi_1.2.0.8= comboam4_pi_1.0.0.9= comboam4_v2_pi_1.2.0.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Retrieve BIOS/UEFI firmware versionOn Linux, run 'dmidecode -s bios-version' or check /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_version. On Windows, run 'wmic bios get smbiosbiosversion'. On macOS, run 'system_profiler SPHardwareDataType' and look for 'BIOS Version'.Affected if The reported BIOS version contains the firmware identifiers comboam4_pi_1.0.0.9 or comboam4_v2_pi_1.2.0.8 exactly as listed in the affected versions.
-
Identify AMD AGESA firmware componentUse tools like 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' on Linux and search for 'AGESA' or 'comboam4' strings. On Windows, use CPU-Z or HWiNFO to extract detailed firmware information. AMD Ryzen Master utility may also display AGESA version.Affected if The detected AGESA or comboam4 firmware version matches exactly comboam4_pi_1.0.0.9 or comboam4_v2_pi_1.2.0.8.
-
Verify processor modelRun 'lscpu' on Linux, 'wmic cpu get name' on Windows, or check system documentation to confirm the exact AMD Ryzen processor model.Affected if The processor is an AMD Ryzen 9 3900, 3900x, 3900xt, 3950x, Ryzen 7 3700x, 3800x, 3800xt, or Ryzen 5 3500.
A system is affected if it uses an AMD Ryzen processor from the listed models AND the BIOS/AGESA firmware version equals exactly comboam4_pi_1.0.0.9 or comboam4_v2_pi_1.2.0.8.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply AMD processor firmware/BIOS updates as released through OEM vendors; this is a hardware-level vulnerability requiring vendor-supplied firmware patches rather than software remediation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-23820 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-23820 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data