CVE-2022-23916
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site scripting vulnerability in a-blog cms Ver.2.8.x series versions prior to Ver.2.8.75, Ver.2.9.x series versions prior to Ver.2.9.40, Ver.2.10.x series versions prior to Ver.2.10.44, Ver.2.11.x series versions prior to Ver.2.11.42, and Ver.3.0.x series versions prior to Ver.3.0.1 allows a remote authenticated attacker to inject an arbitrary script via unspecified vectors. This vulnerability is different from CVE-2022-24374.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in a-blog cms allows an authenticated remote attacker to inject arbitrary JavaScript code. The vulnerability affects multiple version series (2.8.x through 3.0.x) prior to their respective patched releases (2.8.75, 2.9.40, 2.10.44, 2.11.42, and 3.0.1). This is a stored XSS vulnerability distinct from CVE-2022-24374.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.8.0, < 2.8.75>= 2.9.0, < 2.9.40>= 2.10.0, < 2.10.44>= 2.11.0, < 2.11.42= 3.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed a-blog cms versionLocate the version file in the a-blog cms installation directory or access the admin panel and look for the version information typically displayed in the system settings or footer areaAffected if The version is 2.8.0 to 2.8.74, 2.9.0 to 2.9.39, 2.10.0 to 2.10.43, 2.11.0 to 2.11.41, or exactly 3.0.0
-
Verify admin/user authentication is enabledConfirm that user accounts exist and authentication is configured for the a-blog cms installationAffected if The system allows authenticated user logins, as this XSS requires an authenticated attacker to inject the malicious script
-
Identify if comment or user-submitted content modules are activeReview the site configuration or installed modules in the admin panel to determine if any user input fields (such as comment forms, contact forms, or user profile fields) are enabledAffected if Modules that accept and store user-submitted content are enabled and accessible to authenticated users, as this is a stored XSS vulnerability
You are affected if your a-blog cms version falls within the affected ranges AND authenticated users can submit content that gets stored on the site.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.8.752.9.402.10.44
Upgrade a-blog cms to the fixed versions (2.8.75, 2.9.40, 2.10.44, 2.11.42, or 3.0.1 or later) to remediate the vulnerability. As this requires authenticated access, ensure that user account security is enforced and consider reviewing user permissions.
Upgrade to Ver.2.8.75+, Ver.2.9.40+, Ver.2.10.44+, Ver.2.11.42+, or Ver.3.0.1+ (any branch that fits your deployment)
- 1. Back up the entire a-blog cms installation including database before attempting any upgrade
- 2. Download the appropriate fixed version from the official a-blog cms website (developer.a-blogcms.jp) or official distribution channels
- 3. For 2.8.x branch: upgrade to Ver.2.8.75 or later
- 4. For 2.9.x branch: upgrade to Ver.2.9.40 or later
- 5. For 2.10.x branch: upgrade to Ver.2.10.44 or later
- 6. For 2.11.x branch: upgrade to Ver.2.11.42 or later
- 7. For 3.0.x branch: upgrade to Ver.3.0.1 or later
- 8. Follow the official upgrade documentation for your specific version upgrade path
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-23916 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-23916 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data