CVE-2022-23959
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Varnish Cache before 6.6.2 and 7.x before 7.0.2, Varnish Cache 6.0 LTS before 6.0.10, and and Varnish Enterprise (Cache Plus) 4.1.x before 4.1.11r6 and 6.0.x before 6.0.9r4, request smuggling can occur for HTTP/1 connections.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA request smuggling vulnerability in Varnish Cache allows attackers to manipulate HTTP/1 request parsing, potentially causing the front-end and back-end servers to interpret requests differently. This can lead to cache poisoning, session hijacking, or bypassing security controls.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 35= 9.0= 10.0= 11.0>= 1.0.0, < 6.6.2>= 4.1.1, < 4.1.11r6= 4.1>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.10>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.9r4>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Varnish versionRun `varnishd -V` or `varnishd --version` to see the exact version numberAffected if The version falls within any of these ranges: <6.6.2 (for 6.x), <4.1.11r6 (for 4.1.x), <6.0.10 (for 6.0.x), <7.0.2 (for 7.x), or is 4.1 (any update level)
-
Check Varnish service statusRun `systemctl status varnish` or `service varnish status` to confirm if Varnish is actively runningAffected if Varnish is running and serving HTTP traffic (the vulnerability requires an active Varnish instance to be exploitable)
-
Verify package version on FedoraRun `rpm -qa | grep varnish` to list installed Varnish packagesAffected if Any varnish package is installed on Fedora 35 (which ships vulnerable Varnish versions)
-
Verify package version on DebianRun `dpkg -l | grep varnish` to list installed Varnish packagesAffected if Any varnish package is installed on Debian 9, 10, or 11 (which ship vulnerable Varnish versions)
You are affected if Varnish Cache is installed and the version is less than 6.6.2, 4.1.11r6, 6.0.10, or 7.0.2 (or is exactly version 4.1), regardless of whether it is the open source or Plus edition.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.1.11r66.0.9r46.0.10
Upgrade Varnish Cache to version 6.6.2, 7.0.2, or 6.0.10 (or the corresponding Enterprise versions 4.1.11r6/6.0.9r4) to resolve the HTTP/1 request smuggling issue.
Varnish Cache 6.0.x -> 6.0.10; Varnish Cache 6.x -> 6.6.2; Varnish Cache 7.x -> 7.0.2; Varnish Cache Plus 4.1.x -> 4.1.11r6; Varnish Cache Plus 6.0.x -> 6.0.9r4
- 1. Identify the currently installed Varnish version using: varnishd -V
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on your current version (6.0.x -> 6.0.10, 6.x -> 6.6.2, 7.x -> 7.0.2, or Enterprise variants to their respective patched releases)
- 3. For Fedora systems: Run 'sudo dnf update varnish' to upgrade to the patched version available in Fedora 35 repositories
- 4. For Debian systems: Run 'sudo apt update && sudo apt install varnish' to upgrade to the patched version available in Debian repositories
- 5. For Varnish Cache Plus (Enterprise): Contact Varnish Software for the patched packages (4.1.11r6 or 6.0.9r4)
- 6. After upgrading, restart the Varnish service using: sudo systemctl restart varnish
- 7. Verify the new version is running: varnishd -V
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,864.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-23959 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-23959 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data