CVE-2022-24031
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in NvmExpressDxe in Insyde InsydeH2O with kernel 5.1 through 5.5. An SMM memory corruption vulnerability allows an attacker to write fixed or predictable data to SMRAM. Exploiting this issue could lead to escalating privileges to SMM.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceNvmExpressDxe driver in InsydeH2O kernel 5.1-5.5 contains a memory corruption vulnerability that allows writing fixed or predictable data to SMRAM (System Management RAM), enabling an attacker to escalate privileges to System Management Mode.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.1, < 5.16.42>= 5.2, < 5.26.42>= 5.3, < 5.35.42>= 5.4, < 5.43.42>= 5.5, < 5.51.42CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify InsydeH2O firmware versionRun `dmidecode -t 0` and look for the BIOS Version or Firmware Revision field. On some systems, check `/sys/class/dmi/id/bios_version` or `/sys/class/dmi/id/bios_vendor`. The vendor string should contain 'Insyde' or 'InsydeH2O'.Affected if The displayed version falls within any of these ranges: 5.1 to 5.16.41, 5.2 to 5.26.41, 5.3 to 5.35.41, 5.4 to 5.43.41, or 5.5 to 5.51.41.
-
Confirm vendor is InsydeExamine the BIOS vendor name from the same dmidecode output or from `/sys/class/dmi/id/bios_vendor`. Ensure the firmware is from Insyde rather than another UEFI vendor.Affected if The vendor is listed as Insyde or InsydeH2O.
-
Check if NvmExpressDxe driver is presentOn systems with UEFI shell available, run `dh -d` to list loaded drivers and look for NvmExpressDxe. Alternatively, check system firmware dumps or UEFI variable logs for references to this driver.Affected if The NvmExpressDxe driver is loaded in the UEFI environment.
-
Determine if NVMe storage is presentCheck for NVMe controllers in the system: run `lspci | grep -i nvme` on Linux or check Device Manager on Windows. Also check `ls /dev/nvme*` on Linux.Affected if NVMe hardware is present and the NvmExpressDxe driver would be invoked to initialize it.
-
Assess SMRAM accessibilityCheck if SMM (System Management Mode) is accessible or if there are any SMRAM protection mechanisms. On Linux, examine output from `ls /dev/mem` permissions or look for SMM-related kernel parameters. A system with unrestricted SMRAM is more exposed.Affected if SMRAM is accessible without additional protections like SMM lock or TPM-based sealing.
The system is affected if it runs InsydeH2O firmware with a version between 5.1 and the respective patch thresholds (5.16.42, 5.26.42, 5.35.42, 5.43.42, or 5.51.42), and the NvmExpressDxe driver is loaded to initialize NVMe storage.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.16.425.26.425.35.42
Apply vendor-provided UEFI firmware updates from Insyde; if unavailable, consider disabling SMM or implementing secure boot protections to reduce attack surface.
Upgrade to InsydeH2O kernel version 5.16.42 or higher (5.1.x branch), 5.26.42 or higher (5.2.x branch), 5.35.42 or higher (5.3.x branch), or 5.43.42 or higher (5.4.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current InsydeH2O kernel version installed on the affected system by checking the UEFI/BIOS firmware version information
- 2. Determine which version branch (5.1.x, 5.2.x, 5.3.x, or 5.4.x) the current firmware is based on
- 3. Obtain the latest UEFI firmware update from the system vendor (OEM) that includes the InsydeH2O fix
- 4. Apply the firmware update following the vendor's standard BIOS/UEFI update process (typically via flashing the firmware from within the OS or via recovery mechanism)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24031 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24031 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data