Dicom Viewer ProApplication · Santesoft

CVE-2022-24057

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-02-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Sante DICOM Viewer Pro 11.8.7.0. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of J2K files. Crafted data in a J2K file can trigger a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-15077.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Buffer overflow vulnerability in Sante DICOM Viewer Pro's J2K file parser. Attackers can craft malicious J2K files that trigger a write past the end of an allocated buffer during parsing, allowing arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user process.

MitigationAvoid opening untrusted J2K or DICOM files. Apply vendor-supplied patches for Sante DICOM Viewer Pro when available. Consider file type validation and sandboxing for additional defense-in-depth.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Dicom Viewer ProApplication
Affected:= 11.8.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Sante DICOM Viewer Pro is installed
    Check for the presence of Sante DICOM Viewer Pro application in the system (typically in Program Files or Program Files x86). Look for executable files named similar to 'Sante DICOM Viewer Pro.exe' or check Windows Add/Remove Programs for the application.
    Affected if The application is not installed on the system, then this CVE does not apply.
  2. Determine installed version
    Right-click the application executable, select Properties, then view the Details tab for version information. Alternatively, check the application's About or Help menu for version details.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 11.8.7, indicating the specific version affected by this CVE.
  3. Identify J2K file handling capability
    Examine if the application has been configured to handle or process J2K (JPEG 2000) files. Check file association settings or application preferences for supported image formats.
    Affected if J2K file parsing is enabled or the application automatically processes J2K files embedded in DICOM images, making it vulnerable to crafted files.
  4. Review recent DICOM file imports
    Check the application\'s recent files list, import history, or designated DICOM folders for recently opened .dcm or .j2k files. Examine file sources to determine if any originated from untrusted sources.
    Affected if The application has recently opened DICOM or J2K files from untrusted or external sources, creating potential attack surface.

A system is affected only if Sante DICOM Viewer Pro version 11.8.7 is installed AND the system processes J2K or DICOM files containing J2K images.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Avoid opening untrusted J2K or DICOM files. Apply vendor-supplied patches for Sante DICOM Viewer Pro when available. Consider file type validation and sandboxing for additional defense-in-depth.

Fix this in Dicom Viewer Pro Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,280
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24057 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24057 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data