Dicom Viewer ProApplication · Santesoft

CVE-2022-24061

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-02-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Sante DICOM Viewer Pro 11.8.7.0. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DCM files. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-15100.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A remote information disclosure vulnerability exists in Sante DICOM Viewer Pro 11.8.7.0 during DCM file parsing. The vulnerability results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on that object. Successful exploitation requires user interaction (opening a malicious DCM file), and the vulnerability can be chained with other flaws to achieve arbitrary code execution.

MitigationUsers should avoid opening untrusted or unverified DCM files from unknown sources. The vendor should release a patch that adds proper object existence validation checks before operations in the DCM parsing routine.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Dicom Viewer ProApplication
Affected:= 11.8.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if Sante DICOM Viewer Pro is installed
    Look for the application in the system program files directory, or check for the application in Add/Remove Programs (Windows) or the Applications folder (Mac). Search for 'Sante DICOM Viewer Pro' in installed programs.
    Affected if The application is present on the system.
  2. Verify the installed version number
    Open Sante DICOM Viewer Pro and navigate to Help > About, or right-click the executable and select Properties > Details to view the version information. The exact version will be listed.
    Affected if The version is exactly 11.8.7.
  3. Confirm DCM file handling is used
    Identify if the user or automated processes open DCM (DICOM) files using Sante DICOM Viewer Pro. Check for recent .dcm file associations or default program settings.
    Affected if The application is configured to open or processes DCM files.
  4. Assess file source handling practices
    Review whether the system or users open DCM files from untrusted or unknown sources. Check browser download folders, email attachments, or network shares for DCM files of unknown origin.
    Affected if Users routinely open DCM files from untrusted or unverified sources without validation.

The environment is affected if Sante DICOM Viewer Pro version 11.8.7 is installed AND users or processes open DCM files from untrusted sources, as exploitation requires opening a malicious DCM file.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Users should avoid opening untrusted or unverified DCM files from unknown sources. The vendor should release a patch that adds proper object existence validation checks before operations in the DCM parsing routine.

Fix this in Dicom Viewer Pro Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24061 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24061 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data