CVE-2022-24062
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThis vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Sante DICOM Viewer Pro 13.2.0.21165. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of JP2 files. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-15104.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a memory corruption vulnerability in Sante DICOM Viewer Pro where the JP2 (JPEG 2000) file parser fails to validate that an object exists before performing operations on it, likely a null pointer dereference. An attacker can exploit this by tricking a user into opening a malicious JP2 file, allowing arbitrary code execution in the context of the current process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 11.9.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if Sante DICOM Viewer Pro is installedCheck Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for an entry named 'Sante DICOM Viewer Pro', or look for the executable in common installation paths such as C:\Program Files\Santesoft\DICOM Viewer Pro\Affected if The software is found on the system
-
Determine the installed version numberOpen the application's main executable (typically SanteDICOMViewer.exe), right-click and select Properties, then check the Details tab for the Product Version field; alternatively, check the Uninstall registry key for the DisplayVersion valueAffected if The version displayed is lower than 11.9.2 (for example, 11.9.1, 11.9.0, or earlier)
-
Confirm JP2 file association with the viewerCheck Windows file association settings for .jp2 files by running 'assoc .jp2' in Command Prompt, or look in the viewer's options/settings for enabled file type handlersAffected if The .jp2 file extension is associated with Sante DICOM Viewer Pro or JP2 parsing is enabled in the viewer settings
-
Check for recent JP2 file activityOpen the viewer's recent files or history feature (usually found in the File menu), or check the Windows Recent folder %APPDATA%\Santesoft\DICOM Viewer Pro\Recent for .jp2 entriesAffected if Any JP2 files have been opened with this viewer, indicating the vulnerable code path could be triggered
You are affected if Sante DICOM Viewer Pro is installed with a version lower than 11.9.2 and the application is used to open JP2 image files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped11.9.2
Users should avoid opening JP2 or DICOM files from untrusted sources. Organizations should deploy the vendor patch when available and consider network segmentation for systems running this viewer.
11.9.2
- Check current version of Sante DICOM Viewer Pro by opening the application and navigating to Help > About or similar version information menu
- Download Sante DICOM Viewer Pro version 11.9.2 or later from the official vendor website or trusted distribution channel
- Close any running instances of Sante DICOM Viewer Pro
- Install the updated version 11.9.2 or newer over the existing installation, or uninstall the old version first before installing the new one
- Restart the application and verify the new version is installed correctly
- Avoid opening untrusted or suspicious JP2 files from unknown sources as a precautionary measure
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24062 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24062 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data