Dicom Viewer ProApplication · Santesoft

CVE-2022-24064

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-02-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Sante DICOM Viewer Pro 11.8.8.0. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of J2K images. Crafted data in a J2K file can trigger a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-15161.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Sante DICOM Viewer Pro 11.8.8.0 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in its J2K image parser. When parsing specially crafted J2K image files, the application writes data past the end of an allocated buffer, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

MitigationUsers should avoid opening J2K files from untrusted sources. The vendor should release a patch that adds proper bounds checking in the J2K parsing code to prevent buffer overflows.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Dicom Viewer ProApplication
Affected:= 11.8.8

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Sante DICOM Viewer Pro installation
    Check for the application in the installed programs list (Windows Control Panel > Programs and Features) or look for the executable (typically in C:\Program Files\Santesoft\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\Santesoft\)
    Affected if The application is installed on the system
  2. Identify installed version number
    Right-click on the Sante DICOM Viewer Pro executable, select Properties, and check the Details tab for the File Version or Product Version
    Affected if The version shown is exactly 11.8.8.0 (the vulnerable build)
  3. Verify J2K image parsing capability exists
    Open Sante DICOM Viewer Pro and attempt to load a J2K (JPEG 2000) image file, or check the supported import formats in the application Help or About menu
    Affected if J2K file support is present and functional in the installed version
  4. Review recent file access logs if available
    Check Windows Event Viewer or any application logging for recently opened .j2k or .jp2 files
    Affected if J2K files have been opened with this application, indicating the vulnerable code path was exercised

If Sante DICOM Viewer Pro version 11.8.8.0 is installed and the J2K image parsing feature is present and has been used to open files, the environment is affected by this buffer overflow vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Users should avoid opening J2K files from untrusted sources. The vendor should release a patch that adds proper bounds checking in the J2K parsing code to prevent buffer overflows.

Fix this in Dicom Viewer Pro Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,120
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24064 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24064 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data