CVE-2022-24111
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Mahara 21.04 before 21.04.3 and 21.10 before 21.10.1, portfolios created in groups that have not been shared with non-group members and portfolios created on the site and institution levels can be viewed without requiring a login if the URL to these portfolios is known.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMahara before 21.04.3 and 21.10.1 contains a broken access control vulnerability where portfolios created in private groups or at site/institution levels can be accessed by unauthenticated users who know the direct URL. This is an IDOR-style authorization bypass where the application fails to verify user authentication before serving portfolio content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 21.04.0, < 21.04.3= 21.10.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Mahara versionLog into the Mahara admin dashboard and navigate to Administration > Configuration > Site options, or check the version file in the Mahara installation directory if you have CLI access. Compare the version number to the affected ranges: >= 21.04.0, < 21.04.3 or = 21.10.0Affected if The installed version falls within 21.04.0 through 21.04.2, or is exactly 21.10.0
-
Identify private portfoliosIn the Mahara UI, browse to the Pages and collections section. Look for portfolios created in private groups (group visibility set to private/members-only) or portfolios at site or institution level with restricted access settingsAffected if There are portfolios in private groups or with site/institution-level restricted access
-
Test unauthenticated URL accessCopy the direct URL of a private portfolio (from a browser while logged in), then open an incognito/private browser window and attempt to navigate to that URL without logging inAffected if The private portfolio loads and displays content without requiring authentication (the page should redirect to login or return an error, but if content is served, the system is vulnerable)
-
Verify authentication enforcementAfter confirming a portfolio URL is accessible unauthenticated, attempt the same with different private portfolios from different private groups or institution levels to confirm the patternAffected if Any private portfolio is accessible without authentication using its direct URL, indicating broken access control
You are affected if your Mahara version is 21.04.0-21.04.2 or 21.10.0 AND you have portfolios in private groups or at site/institution level that can be accessed by unauthenticated users who know the direct URL.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.04.3
Apply the vendor patch by updating Mahara to version 21.04.3 or 21.10.1 or later, then verify that portfolio access controls correctly require authentication for all private portfolios.
Mahara 21.04.3+ or 21.10.1+ (depending on your branch)
- Identify the current Mahara version by checking the admin panel or VERSION file in the installation directory
- Backup the Mahara database and all files including the htdocs directory
- For Mahara 21.04.x: upgrade to version 21.04.3 or later
- For Mahara 21.10.0: upgrade to version 21.10.1 or later
- Run the upgrade script via the web interface or command line (php admin/upgrade.php)
- Verify that portfolios at site and institution levels, as well as unshared group portfolios, now require authentication
- Clear all caches after upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24111 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24111 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data