CVE-2022-24286
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAcer QuickAccess 2.01.300x before 2.01.3030 and 3.00.30xx before 3.00.3038 contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability. The user process communicates with a service of system authority through a named pipe. In this case, the Named Pipe is also given Read and Write rights to the general user. In addition, the service program does not verify the user when communicating. A thread may exist with a specific command. When the path of the program to be executed is sent, there is a local privilege escalation in which the service program executes the path with system privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAcer QuickAccess contains a local privilege escalation where a user-accessible named pipe lacks proper access controls. The service running as SYSTEM does not verify user identity when processing commands sent through the named pipe, allowing any local user to send a program path that the service will execute with elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.01.3000, < 2.01.3030>= 3.00.3000, < 3.00.3038CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Acer QuickAccess installationOpen Programs and Features (appwiz.cpl) or check C:\Program Files\Acer\QuickAccess for the application folderAffected if Acer QuickAccess is present on the system
-
Identify installed versionRight-click the application in Programs and Features and select Properties, or check the version info in the QuickAccess executable fileAffected if Version is 2.01.3000 through 2.01.3029 OR 3.00.3000 through 3.00.3037
-
Verify vulnerable service existsUse Task Manager or services.msc to check for the Acer QuickAccess service running on the systemAffected if The Acer QuickAccess service is running and the version falls within the affected ranges
-
Confirm named pipe exposureUse Sysinternals PipeList or check with PowerShell Get-Process to identify named pipes created by the QuickAccess serviceAffected if Acer QuickAccess service is running and creates a named pipe accessible to all users, with version in affected range
A user is affected if Acer QuickAccess is installed with version 2.01.3000-2.01.3029 or 3.00.3000-3.00.3037, enabling an unprivileged local user to escalate via the unprotected named pipe.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.01.30303.00.3038
Update Acer QuickAccess to version 2.01.3030 or later for the 2.01.300x branch, or 3.00.3038 or later for the 3.00.30xx branch to remediate this vulnerability.
Acer QuickAccess 2.01.3030 (for 2.01.3xxx branch) or 3.00.3038 (for 3.00.3xxx branch)
- 1. Identify the installed Acer QuickAccess version by checking Programs and Features or the application's About/Help section
- 2. For systems with QuickAccess version 2.01.3xxx: upgrade to version 2.01.3030 or later
- 3. For systems with QuickAccess version 3.00.3xxx: upgrade to version 3.00.3038 or later
- 4. Download the updated Acer QuickAccess installer from Acer's official support website (acer.com) or through the Acer QuickAccess auto-update feature if available
- 5. Run the installer with administrator privileges and complete the upgrade
- 6. Restart the computer to ensure the new service version is loaded
- 7. Verify the installed version matches or exceeds the fixed versions (2.01.3030 or 3.00.3038)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24286 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24286 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data