CVE-2022-24355
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThis vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of TP-Link TL-WR940N 3.20.1 Build 200316 Rel.34392n (5553) routers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of file name extensions. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-13910.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in TP-Link TL-WR940N router firmware (v3.20.1) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code as root via parsing file name extensions without authentication. The vulnerability stems from missing length validation on user-supplied data before copying into a fixed-size stack buffer, enabling overflow and code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 211111CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is TP-Link TL-WR940NAccess the router admin web interface (typically at 192.168.0.1 or 192.168.1.1) and navigate to Status or System menu to view the device model. Alternatively, check the device label on the router hardware itself.Affected if Device model is TP-Link TL-WR940N
-
Check installed firmware versionIn the router admin web interface, go to Status or System > Firmware Version. Compare the version number displayed against the affected range (any version before 211111, including v3.20.1).Affected if Firmware version is less than 211111
-
Verify remote management access settingsIn the router admin web interface, navigate to Security or Remote Management settings. Check if 'Remote Management' or 'WAN Management' is enabled, and note which IP addresses or interfaces are permitted access.Affected if Remote management is enabled and accessible from WAN interface (0.0.0.0 or broad range)
-
Confirm vulnerability trigger conditionThe vulnerability triggers when the router parses file name extensions in HTTP requests. This is a passive condition - the flaw exists if the firmware version is vulnerable, regardless of current network activity.Affected if Firmware version is vulnerable (< 211111) and the router is network-accessible
A user is affected if they own a TP-Link TL-WR940N router running firmware version less than 211111, particularly if remote management is enabled on the WAN interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped211111
Apply vendor firmware patch when available. Until then, restrict network access to the router's management interface, disable WAN management, and segment the device on an isolated network.
TP-Link TL-WR940N firmware version 211111 or later
- 1. Visit the official TP-Link support website for the TL-WR940N router
- 2. Download the latest firmware version (211111 or later) for your hardware version
- 3. Access the router's web management interface by navigating to the router's IP address
- 4. Navigate to System Tools > Firmware Upgrade (or similar path)
- 5. Click the button to choose the downloaded firmware file
- 6. Wait for the upload and flashing process to complete - do not power off the router
- 7. After reboot, verify the firmware version has been updated to 211111 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24355 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24355 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data