CVE-2022-24389
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerability in rconfig “cert_utils” enables an attacker with user level access to the CLI to inject root level commands into Fidelis Network and Deception CommandPost, Collector, Sensor, and Sandbox components as well as neighboring Fidelis components. The vulnerability is present in Fidelis Network and Deception versions prior to 9.4.5. Patches and updates are available to address this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA command injection vulnerability in the rconfig 'cert_utils' component allows authenticated users with standard CLI access to execute commands with root privileges on Fidelis Network and Deception platforms. This privilege escalation affects CommandPost, Collector, Sensor, and Sandbox components in versions prior to 9.4.5.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.4.5< 9.4.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Fidelis product versionRun 'rconfig --version' or check the Fidelis component version through the CLI interface (typically via 'show version' or looking at /opt/fidelis/version file)Affected if Version is below 9.4.5 for either Fidelis Deception or Fidelis Network platforms
-
Confirm the rconfig component is presentCheck for the existence of the rconfig utility on the system, typically located at /usr/bin/rconfig or accessible via CLI command 'rconfig'Affected if The rconfig command is available and functional on the system
-
Verify cert_utils module existsInspect the rconfig installation directory for the cert_utils component, typically found in /opt/fidelis/lib/ or similar library paths, or run 'rconfig -h' to list available modulesAffected if The cert_utils module is present within the rconfig component
-
Check CLI user access privilegesReview the system's CLI user configuration by examining /etc/passwd for users with Fidelis CLI access, or use 'show users' or 'list users' command if available in the Fidelis CLIAffected if Standard (non-root) users have CLI access enabled on the system
-
Audit recent rconfig execution logsReview system logs (typically /var/log/messages, /var/log/audit/audit.log, or Fidelis-specific logs in /opt/fidelis/logs/) for rconfig or cert_utils execution historyAffected if There are log entries showing rconfig cert_utils commands executed by non-root users
The environment is affected if running Fidelis Deception or Network with any component (CommandPost, Collector, Sensor, Sandbox) at a version prior to 9.4.5, where the rconfig utility with cert_utils module is present and standard CLI user accounts exist.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.4.5
Upgrade all affected Fidelis components (CommandPost, Collector, Sensor, Sandbox) to version 9.4.5 or later to apply the patched cert_utils module.
9.4.5
- Obtain Fidelis Network and Deception version 9.4.5 or later from the official vendor (fidelissecurity.zendesk.com)
- Review vendor release notes and upgrade documentation for version 9.4.5
- Create a complete backup of the current Fidelis configuration before upgrading
- Apply the upgrade to Fidelis Network and Deception components (CommandPost, Collector, Sensor, and Sandbox)
- Verify the installed version is 9.4.5 or later after upgrade completes
- Confirm the rconfig cert_utils vulnerability is no longer exploitable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24389 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24389 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data