NasApplication · Starwindsoftware

CVE-2022-24551

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-02-06
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.2 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw was found in StarWind Stack. The endpoint for setting a new password doesn’t check the current username and old password. An attacker could reset any local user password (including system/administrator user) using any available user This affects StarWind SAN and NAS v0.2 build 1633.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The password reset endpoint in StarWind SAN and NAS v0.2 build 1633 lacks proper authentication validation - it does not verify the user's identity by checking the current username and old password before permitting a password change. This allows an attacker to reset any local user account password, including administrative accounts, leading to full system compromise.

MitigationApply vendor patch when available; prior to patch, restrict network access to the management interface and monitor for unauthorized password change attempts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
NasApplication
Affected:< 0.2
SanApplication
Affected:< 0.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed StarWind product
    Determine whether the system is running StarWind SAN or StarWind NAS by reviewing installed software, services, or system documentation
    Affected if The product is StarWind SAN or StarWind NAS and the version is below 0.2
  2. Check the installed version
    Locate the version information for the StarWind SAN or NAS installation through the software GUI, command-line interface, or installed package details
    Affected if The installed version is below 0.2 (any version prior to v0.2)
  3. Confirm the build number
    Find the build number associated with the installation, typically visible in the software about section, logs, or installation files
    Affected if The build number is 1633 or lower
  4. Determine management interface exposure
    Review network configuration to check if the StarWind management interface is accessible from untrusted networks or the internet
    Affected if The management interface is exposed to network segments that are not trusted or are externally accessible
  5. Inspect password reset endpoint access control
    Test or review the password reset functionality to verify whether it requires valid authentication (current username and old password) before allowing a password change
    Affected if The password reset endpoint allows password changes without validating the user's identity first

The environment is affected if StarWind SAN or NAS version is below 0.2 and the password reset endpoint does not require authentication verification before permitting password changes.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.2 or later
Fixed in 0.2
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor patch when available; prior to patch, restrict network access to the management interface and monitor for unauthorized password change attempts.

Fix this in Nas Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24551 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24551 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data