CVE-2022-24742
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSylius is an open source eCommerce platform. Prior to versions 1.9.10, 1.10.11, and 1.11.2, any other user can view the data if browser tab remains unclosed after log out. The issue is fixed in versions 1.9.10, 1.10.11, and 1.11.2. A workaround is available. The application must strictly redirect to login page even browser back button is pressed. Another possibility is to set more strict cache policies for restricted content.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSylius eCommerce platform versions prior to 1.9.10, 1.10.11, and 1.11.2 fail to properly clear sensitive user data from browser cache after logout. When a user logs out while keeping a browser tab open, cached page content remains accessible to other users who open the same browser, allowing unauthorized viewing of previous session data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.9.10>= 1.10.0, < 1.10.11>= 1.11.0, < 1.11.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Sylius versionCheck the composer.json file in the project root for the 'sylius/sylius' package version, or run 'composer show sylius/sylius' to see the installed versionAffected if The version is below 1.9.10, between 1.10.0 and 1.10.11, or between 1.11.0 and 1.11.2
-
Inspect cache-control headers on authenticated routesLog into the admin panel, then log out while keeping a browser tab open. Use browser developer tools (Network tab) to inspect HTTP response headers on authenticated pages, specifically looking for Cache-Control headersAffected if Authenticated pages do not include 'no-store' or 'no-cache' directives in their Cache-Control header, allowing cached content to persist after logout
-
Review security configuration for cache headersExamine the Sylius security configuration files (typically in config/packages/security.yaml or similar) and check if the firewall configuration for admin/Shop areas includes proper cache header settingsAffected if The security configuration lacks cache-control directives (no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, private) for authenticated areas
-
Test browser cache persistence after logoutLog into the admin panel, navigate to a page with sensitive data, then log out. Attempt to access the previous page URL directly or use the browser back button to see if cached content remains visibleAffected if Cached page content from the previous session remains accessible after logout
A user is affected if their Sylius installation version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND proper cache-control headers are not configured for authenticated pages, allowing cached sensitive data to persist after logout.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.9.101.10.111.11.2
Configure strict cache-control headers (no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, private) for all authenticated pages and implement server-side redirects to the login page when the back button is pressed after logout.
Upgrade to Sylius 1.9.10 (for 1.9.x), 1.10.11 (for 1.10.x), or 1.11.2 (for 1.11.x)
- Identify your current Sylius version branch (1.9.x, 1.10.x, or 1.11.x) by checking your composer.json or installed version
- For 1.9.x branch: upgrade to version 1.9.10 or later
- For 1.10.x branch: upgrade to version 1.10.11 or later
- For 1.11.x branch: upgrade to version 1.11.2 or later
- Run composer update sylius/sylius to apply the changes
- Clear the application cache after upgrade (bin/console cache:clear)
- Test logout behavior: log in, access restricted content, log out, then press the browser back button to verify sensitive data is not displayed from cache
- As an alternative configuration workaround, ensure your web server and application set Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate headers for all authenticated routes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24742 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24742 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data