CVE-2022-24878
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFlux is an open and extensible continuous delivery solution for Kubernetes. Path Traversal in the kustomize-controller via a malicious `kustomization.yaml` allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service at the controller level. Workarounds include automated tooling in the user's CI/CD pipeline to validate `kustomization.yaml` files conform with specific policies. This vulnerability is fixed in kustomize-controller v0.24.0 and included in flux2 v0.29.0. Users are recommended to upgrade.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePath traversal vulnerability in kustomize-controller allows attackers to craft malicious kustomization.yaml files that can cause a Denial of Service at the controller level in Flux CD deployments for Kubernetes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 0.29.0< 0.24.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify kustomize-controller deployment versionRun: kubectl get deployment -A -o jsonpath='{..metadata.name}' | tr ' ' '\n' | grep kustomize-controller. Then get the image with: kubectl get deployment -n flux-system kustomize-controller -o jsonpath='{.spec.template.spec.containers[0].image}'Affected if The image tag shows a version lower than v0.24.0 (e.g., v0.23.0, v0.22.0, etc.)
-
Identify flux2 CLI versionRun: flux --versionAffected if The reported flux version is lower than 0.29.0 (e.g., 0.28.0, 0.27.0, etc.)
-
Verify kustomize-controller is runningRun: kubectl get pods -n flux-system -l app=kustomize-controllerAffected if The controller pod exists and is in Running status, indicating it can process kustomization.yaml files
-
Check if any kustomization resources existRun: kubectl get kustomization -AAffected if Any Kustomization resources are present in the cluster, meaning the controller would process kustomization.yaml files containing the vulnerable code path
-
Confirm namespace where flux is installedRun: kubectl get namespaces | grep -E 'flux|weave-gitops'Affected if The flux-system namespace (or custom flux namespace) exists with the controller deployed
You are affected if the kustomize-controller image version is below v0.24.0 OR the flux CLI version is below 0.29.0, and the controller is actively running in your cluster to process kustomization resources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.24.00.29.0
Upgrade to kustomize-controller v0.24.0 or flux2 v0.29.0; alternatively, implement CI/CD pipeline validation tooling to enforce policies on kustomization.yaml files before deployment.
flux2 v0.29.0 or kustomize-controller v0.24.0
- Check current Flux2 or kustomize-controller version using: flux version or kubectl -n flux-system get pods -o jsonpath='{.items[*].spec.containers[*].image}'
- If running Flux2, upgrade to version 0.29.0 or later by updating your Flux installation: flux install --version=0.29.0
- If running kustomize-controller separately, upgrade to version 0.24.0 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the controller version and ensuring all pods are running: flux check --pre and kubectl get pods -n flux-system
- Alternatively, if using GitOps, update your Flux bootstrap to the new version and apply the changes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24878 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24878 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data