CVE-2022-24908
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThis vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.1.0.52543. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of JP2 images. Crafted data in a JP2 image can trigger a read past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16187.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA heap-based buffer overread vulnerability exists in Foxit PDF Reader 11.1.0.52543 when parsing JP2 (JPEG 2000) images. The vulnerability allows a remote attacker to read beyond the bounds of an allocated buffer by tricking a user into opening a maliciously crafted PDF file containing specially crafted JP2 image data, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.1.7>= 11.0.0, < 11.2.1< 11.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Foxit PDF software is installedCheck for Foxit PDF Reader or Foxit PDF Editor in installed programs list (Control Panel > Programs and Features, or run: Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\* | Select DisplayName | findstr Foxit)Affected if Foxit PDF Reader or Foxit PDF Editor appears in the installed programs list
-
Determine installed Foxit versionOpen Foxit PDF Reader/Editor, go to Help > About Foxit PDF Reader/Editor, or right-click the application shortcut and select Properties to view the version informationAffected if The displayed version cannot be determined or is below 11.2.1 for PDF Reader, or below 10.1.7 / between 11.0.0 and 11.1.x for PDF Editor
-
Compare version against affected rangesCheck if the installed version falls into these vulnerable ranges: Foxit PDF Editor versions < 10.1.7, OR versions >= 11.0.0 and < 11.2.1; Foxit PDF Reader versions < 11.2.1Affected if The installed version matches any of these vulnerable ranges: < 10.1.7 for PDF Editor, >= 11.0.0 but < 11.2.1 for PDF Editor, or < 11.2.1 for PDF Reader
-
Identify if JP2 image parsing is in useThis vulnerability triggers specifically when opening PDF files containing JP2 (JPEG 2000) images. There is no configuration to disable JP2 parsing - the risk exists for any PDF opened with affected versionsAffected if The affected Foxit version is installed and the user opens PDF files, as JP2 parsing occurs automatically when a PDF containing such images is opened
A user is affected if Foxit PDF Reader or Foxit PDF Editor is installed with a version less than 11.2.1 (for Reader) or within the vulnerable ranges for Editor (< 10.1.7 or >= 11.0.0 and < 11.2.1).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.1.711.2.1
Update Foxit PDF Reader to the latest version that patches this vulnerability. Avoid opening PDF files from untrusted sources until the patch is applied.
Pdf Reader >= 11.2.1; Pdf Editor >= 11.2.1 (or 10.1.7+ if staying on version 10.x)
- 1. Open Foxit PDF Reader or PDF Editor application
- 2. Navigate to the Help menu
- 3. Select 'Check for Updates' or 'About Foxit [Product]' to identify current version
- 4. Download and install the latest version from the official Foxit website (www.foxit.com)
- 5. Alternatively, download version 11.2.1 or later directly from the Foxit download page
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,248.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24908 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24908 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data