CVE-2022-24946
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Resource Locking vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R Series R12CCPU-V firmware versions "16" and prior, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-Q Series Q03UDECPU the first 5 digits of serial No. "24061" and prior, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-Q Series Q04/06/10/13/20/26/50/100UDEHCPU the first 5 digits of serial No. "24061" and prior, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-Q Series Q03/04/06/13/26UDVCPU the first 5 digits of serial number "24051" and prior, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-Q Series Q04/06/13/26UDPVCPU the first 5 digits of serial number "24051" and prior, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-Q Series Q12DCCPU-V all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-Q Series Q24DHCCPU-V(G) all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-Q Series Q24/26DHCCPU-LS all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-L series L02/06/26CPU(-P) the first 5 digits of serial number "24051" and prior, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-L series L26CPU-(P)BT the first 5 digits of serial number "24051" and prior and Mitsubishi Electric MELIPC Series MI5122-VW firmware versions "05" and prior allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition in Ethernet communications by sending specially crafted packets. A system reset of the products is required for recovery.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn improper resource locking vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC PLCs (iQ-R, Q, L series and MIIPC) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to send specially crafted Ethernet packets that cause a denial of service condition. The vulnerability stems from inadequate locking mechanisms when handling network traffic, leading to resource exhaustion or deadlock. Recovery requires a manual system reset of the affected device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify PLC modelUse Mitsubishi programming software (GX Works3, GX Developer) to query the CPU module, or physically inspect the PLC hardware label to determine the exact model numberAffected if The model matches Q03UDECPU, Q04UDEHCPU, Q04UDPVCPU, Q04UDVCPU, Q100UDEHCPU, Q50UDEHCPU, Q26DHCCPU-LS, or Q26UDEHCPU
-
Verify firmware versionConnect to the PLC via Mitsubishi programming software and navigate to the CPU module diagnostics to read the firmware version stringAffected if The PLC model is one of the affected models - all firmware versions are vulnerable
-
Check network exposureReview network architecture diagrams and firewall rules to determine if the PLC Ethernet port (MELSEC protocol port 5000/5001 or direct IP access) is accessible from untrusted or outside networksAffected if The PLC is reachable from network segments outside the industrial zone without firewall filtering
-
Inspect device availabilityAttempt to communicate with the PLC via ping, MELSEC protocol queries, or programming software connection to verify it is responsiveAffected if The PLC is unresponsive, hangs during communication attempts, or requires manual power cycle to recover - indicating potential exploitation
-
Review network logs for suspicious Ethernet trafficAnalyze network traffic captures or IDS/IPS logs for unusual MELSEC protocol packets, especially from unauthenticated sources or malformed packets targeting port 5000/5001Affected if Traffic logs show malformed Ethernet packets from unexpected sources targeting the PLC
You are affected if you have any of the listed PLC models (Q03UDECPU, Q04UDEHCPU, Q04UDPVCPU, Q04UDVCPU, Q100UDEHCPU, Q50UDEHCPU, Q26DHCCPU-LS, or Q26UDEHCPU) connected to a network where unauthenticated Ethernet access is possible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate affected PLC firmware to versions beyond those specified (R12CCPU-V version "17" or later, Q03UDECPU serial beyond "24061", etc.). As an interim compensating control, implement network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict unauthorized Ethernet access to the industrial network.
Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R R12CCPU-V firmware version 17 or later; MELSEC-Q Series Q03UDECPU/Q04/06/10/13/20/26/50/100UDEHCPU serial number 24062 or later; Q03/04/06/13/26UDVCPU and Q04/06/13/26UDPVCPU serial number 24052 or later; MELSEC-L series L02/06/26CPU(-P)/L26CPU-(P)BT serial number 240
- 1. Identify the specific model and current firmware version/serial number of the affected Mitsubishi Electric PLC device.
- 2. Navigate to the official Mitsubishi Electric support page for MELSEC series products to obtain firmware updates.
- 3. Download the appropriate firmware update for the specific model (e.g., for R12CCPU-V, obtain firmware version "17" or later; for Q03UDECPU/Q04UDEHCPU, obtain version with serial number "24062" or later; for Q03/04/06/13/26UDVCPU and Q04/06/13/26UDPVCPU, obtain version with serial number "24052" or later; for L-series CPUs, obtain version with serial number "24052" or later; for MI5122-VW, obtai
- 4. Follow the manufacturer's firmware update procedure documented in the MELSEC iQ-R or MELSEC-Q programming manual to apply the update.
- 5. After updating, verify the firmware version has been successfully applied.
- 6. Test normal Ethernet communication operations to confirm the DoS vulnerability is remediated.
- 7. Implement network segmentation and firewall rules to limit exposure to unauthenticated remote attackers as an additional compensating control.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,296.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24946 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24946 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data