CVE-2022-24947
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApache JSPWiki user preferences form is vulnerable to CSRF attacks, which can lead to account takeover. Apache JSPWiki users should upgrade to 2.11.2 or later.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache JSPWiki user preferences form lacks anti-CSRF protection, allowing attackers to craft malicious requests that execute unwanted actions (such as changing user settings or passwords) when authenticated users visit attacker-controlled pages, potentially leading to full account takeover.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.11.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Apache JSPWiki versionLog in as administrator and navigate to the 'About' or 'System Information' page in the JSPWiki admin panel, or check the version manifest file in the JSPWiki installation directory (typically found in WEB-INF/lib or the build configuration)Affected if Installed version is any release prior to 2.11.2 (e.g., 2.11.1, 2.11.0, 2.10.x, etc.)
-
Identify user preferences functionalityLocate the UserPreferences or Profile page in JSPWiki where authenticated users can modify their account settings such as email, password, or display preferencesAffected if The preferences form exists and is accessible to authenticated users without requiring explicit CSRF token submission
-
Inspect preferences form for CSRF tokenLog in as a standard user, navigate to the user preferences settings page, view the page source (right-click > View Page Source), and examine the HTML form elements for a hidden input field containing a CSRF token, anti-CSRF token, or security tokenAffected if The preferences form lacks a hidden CSRF token field or the submitted form data does not include a validated token parameter
-
Test form submission without tokenUsing a browser developer tool or HTTP client, attempt to submit a preferences change request to the user preferences endpoint while omitting any CSRF token parameter to see if the request succeedsAffected if The request is processed successfully without requiring a valid CSRF token, indicating the anti-CSRF protection is missing or not enforced
A user is affected if their JSPWiki installation is version 2.11.1 or earlier AND the user preferences form can be submitted without providing a valid CSRF token.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.11.2
Upgrade Apache JSPWiki to version 2.11.2 or later to obtain the CSRF fix.
2.11.2 or later
- 1. Back up your current JSPWiki installation, including the wiki pages directory and database (if any).
- 2. Stop the JSPWiki service running on your server.
- 3. Download Apache JSPWiki version 2.11.2 or later from the official Apache repository (https://jspwiki.apache.org/).
- 4. Replace the existing JSPWiki installation files with the new version files, preserving your configuration and data directories.
- 5. Review and update any configuration files if required by the new version.
- 6. Start the JSPWiki service.
- 7. Verify the upgrade by logging in and checking that the user preferences form loads correctly.
- 8. Test that CSRF protection is working as expected in the new version.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24947 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24947 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data