CVE-2022-24948
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA carefully crafted user preferences for submission could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki, related to the user preferences screen, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. Apache JSPWiki users should upgrade to 2.11.2 or later.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Apache JSPWiki's user preferences screen allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript through crafted user preference submissions, enabling execution in victim browsers and sensitive information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.11.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm JSPWiki installation existsIdentify if Apache JSPWiki web application is deployed in your environment by checking for JSPWiki-related directories, WAR files, or running services on application servers (Tomcat, Jetty, etc.)Affected if JSPWiki is not present in the environment at all
-
Determine installed JSPWiki versionAccess the JSPWiki version information page (typically at /JSPWiki/Edit.jsp?template=info or /JSPWiki/about.jsp) or check version files in the deployed application directoryAffected if The installed version is any version prior to 2.11.2 (e.g., 2.11.1, 2.11.0, 2.10.x, etc.)
-
Verify user preferences functionality is accessibleNavigate to the user preferences or profile settings page in the JSPWiki interface (typically /JSPWiki/UserPreferences.jsp or similar) and confirm the form accepts user inputAffected if User preferences screen is accessible and accepts submissions without sanitization validation
-
Check for existing malicious preference entriesInspect stored user preference data in the JSPWiki backend (database or file-based storage) for any unexpected script tags, JavaScript event handlers, or iframe elements in preference fieldsAffected if Any user preference records contain unescaped HTML/Script content that could execute in a browser
You are affected if Apache JSPWiki is installed with a version lower than 2.11.2 and the user preferences feature is accessible, as this XSS vulnerability allows script injection through preference submissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.11.2
Upgrade Apache JSPWiki to version 2.11.2 or later to remediate the XSS vulnerability.
2.11.2 or later
- 1. Back up the current JSPWiki installation, configuration files, and database/data directory
- 2. Stop the JSPWiki service
- 3. Download JSPWiki version 2.11.2 or later from the official Apache JSPWiki download location (e.g., https://tomcat.apache.org/jspwiki/)
- 4. Extract the new JSPWiki package
- 5. Replace the existing JSPWiki files with the new version, preserving custom configurations
- 6. Restore any custom plugins or extensions that were used in the previous installation
- 7. Start the JSPWiki service
- 8. Verify the installation by logging into the user preferences screen and confirming functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24948 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24948 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data