CVE-2022-24980
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in the Kitodo.Presentation (aka dif) extension before 2.3.2, 3.x before 3.2.3, and 3.3.x before 3.3.4 for TYPO3. A missing access check in an eID script allows an unauthenticated user to submit arbitrary URLs to this component. This results in SSRF, allowing attackers to view the content of any file or webpage the webserver has access to.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Kitodo.Presentation TYPO3 extension before versions 2.3.2, 3.2.3, and 3.3.4 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. An eID script lacks proper access control, allowing unauthenticated attackers to submit arbitrary URLs. This enables viewing of any file or webpage accessible to the webserver, including local file system contents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.3.2>= 3.0.0, < 3.2.3>= 3.3.0, < 3.3.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Kitodo.Presentation extension is installedCheck the TYPO3 extension manager or list installed extensions for 'Kitodo.presentation' or 'kitodo_presentation'Affected if The extension appears in the installed extensions list
-
Identify installed version numberIn TYPO3 extension manager, view the version details of the Kitodo.Presentation extension, or check the ext_emconf.php file in the extension directoryAffected if Version is < 2.3.2, OR >= 3.0.0 and < 3.2.3, OR >= 3.3.0 and < 3.3.4
-
Locate the vulnerable eID scriptSearch for the eID script file in the extension directory, typically named 'eId.php' or similar in the ext/kitodo_presentation/ directoryAffected if The eID script file exists in the extension directory
-
Verify the eID endpoint is accessibleAttempt to access the eID endpoint via a web request to a URL pattern like /?eID=kitodo_presentation or /index.php?eID=kitodo_presentation (use a non-malicious test URL if testing)Affected if The endpoint responds without requiring authentication or authorization checks
-
Confirm file reading capabilityIf testing is permitted, send a request to the eID endpoint with a local file path such as file:///etc/passwd or ../ to observe if file contents are returnedAffected if The response contains contents of local files or the server returns file data from arbitrary paths
If the Kitodo.Presentation extension is installed and its version falls within the affected ranges, and the eID script is accessible without authentication, the environment is vulnerable to SSRF.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.3.23.2.33.3.4
Upgrade the Kitodo.Presentation extension to version 2.3.2, 3.2.3, 3.3.4 or later, which contains the access check fix. If immediate patching is not possible, disable or restrict access to the vulnerable eID script via TYPO3 configuration or web server rules.
Upgrade to 2.3.2+ (for 2.x) or 3.2.3+ (for 3.0-3.2.x) or 3.3.4+ (for 3.3.x)
- 1. Identify the current installed version of Kitodo.presentation extension in your TYPO3 instance
- 2. If using TYPO3 2.x (version < 2.3.2): Plan upgrade to version 2.3.2 or later
- 3. If using TYPO3 3.0.0 - 3.2.x: Plan upgrade to version 3.2.3 or later
- 4. If using TYPO3 3.3.0 - 3.3.x: Plan upgrade to version 3.3.4 or later
- 5. Create a complete backup of the TYPO3 database and files before updating
- 6. Update the Kitodo.presentation extension via TYPO3 Extension Manager or Composer (composer update kitodo/presentation)
- 7. Clear all TYPO3 caches after the update
- 8. Verify the new version is installed correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-24980 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-24980 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data