Ec CubeApplication

CVE-2022-25355

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-02-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.0.18 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
EC-CUBE 3.0.0 to 3.0.18-p3 and EC-CUBE 4.0.0 to 4.1.1 improperly handle HTTP Host header values, which may lead a remote unauthenticated attacker to direct the vulnerable version of EC-CUBE to send an Email with some forged reissue-password URL to EC-CUBE users.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

EC-CUBE fails to validate the HTTP Host header when generating password reissue (reset) URLs in emails. An unauthenticated remote attacker can manipulate the Host header to cause the application to generate password reset emails containing attacker-controlled URLs, potentially allowing credential theft via phishing.

MitigationImplement strict Host header validation using an allowlist of permitted domain names, and/or use relative URLs with server-configured base URLs instead of relying on the Host header for constructing email links.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ec CubeApplication
Affected:>= 3.0.0, < 3.0.18>= 4.0.0, <= 4.1.1= 3.0.18

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed EC-CUBE version
    Locate the version file or check the administration panel for the installed EC-CUBE version number
    Affected if Version is >= 3.0.0 and < 3.0.18, OR = 3.0.18, OR >= 4.0.0 and <= 4.1.1
  2. Confirm password reset functionality is in use
    Verify that the site has user registration enabled and password reset/reset functionality is accessible
    Affected if Password reset feature is active and users can request password reset emails
  3. Check for Host header validation in application configuration
    Review the application configuration files and codebase for any whitelist or validation logic that restricts allowed Host header values
    Affected if No Host header validation whitelist is configured or implemented
  4. Inspect password reset email templates
    Examine the password reset email template code to determine if the reset URL is constructed using the HTTP Host header value directly
    Affected if The reset URL is built using the incoming Host header without validation

Your environment is affected if you are running a vulnerable EC-CUBE version AND the password reset URL generation relies on the unvalidated Host header.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.0.18 or later
Fixed in 3.0.18
Interim mitigation

Implement strict Host header validation using an allowlist of permitted domain names, and/or use relative URLs with server-configured base URLs instead of relying on the Host header for constructing email links.

Recommended fix High confidence

EC-CUBE 3.0.18-p3 or later for 3.x line; EC-CUBE 4.1.2 or later for 4.x line

  1. 1. Identify the current EC-CUBE version by checking the version file or admin panel
  2. 2. For EC-CUBE 3.x versions (3.0.0 to 3.0.18-p3): Upgrade to version 3.0.18-p3 or later
  3. 3. For EC-CUBE 4.x versions (4.0.0 to 4.1.1): Upgrade to version 4.1.2 or later
  4. 4. Before upgrading, backup the database and all files
  5. 5. Review the official EC-CUBE upgrade documentation for your specific version path
  6. 6. Perform the upgrade in a staging environment first to verify compatibility
  7. 7. After upgrade, verify that the HTTP Host header is properly validated and the password reissue emails contain correct URLs
Caveat Review EC-CUBE release notes for any breaking changes between your current version and the target version; custom plugins may require updates

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Ec Cube Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-25355 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-25355 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data