Pexip InfinityApplication · Pexip

CVE-2022-25357

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-07-17
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 27.2 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Pexip Infinity 27.x before 27.2 has Improper Access Control. An attacker can sometimes join a conference (call join) if it has a lock but not a PIN.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Pexip Infinity versions before 27.2 contain an improper access control vulnerability where an attacker can bypass conference locking. Specifically, when a conference is configured with a lock but without a PIN, the lock protection can be circumvented, allowing unauthorized participants to join the call.

MitigationUpgrade Pexip Infinity to version 27.2 or later to remediate the access control bypass. Review conference configurations to ensure appropriate locking and PIN settings are in place.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Pexip InfinityApplication
Affected:>= 27.0, < 27.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Pexip Infinity version
    Access the Pexip Infinity admin interface and navigate to 'Platform' > 'About' or use the command line 'version' command on the management node to retrieve the deployed software version.
    Affected if The installed version is 27.0, 27.1, or any version >= 27.0 but < 27.2.
  2. Review conference lock configurations
    In the Pexip Infinity admin interface, go to 'Conferences' and examine the conference configurations. Look for conferences that have 'Lock conference' enabled.
    Affected if Any conference is configured with the lock option enabled.
  3. Check for PIN requirements on locked conferences
    For each conference with lock enabled, verify whether a PIN (personal identification number) is required to join. This setting is typically found in the conference security or access settings within the admin interface.
    Affected if A conference is locked but does not require a PIN (PIN is set to optional or disabled).

A user is affected if they are running Pexip Infinity version 27.0 through 27.1 and have any conferences configured with locking enabled but without a mandatory PIN requirement.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 27.2 or later
Fixed in 27.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Pexip Infinity to version 27.2 or later to remediate the access control bypass. Review conference configurations to ensure appropriate locking and PIN settings are in place.

Recommended fix High confidence

Pexip Infinity 27.2 or later

  1. 1. Identify the current Pexip Infinity version by accessing the admin interface or checking system information
  2. 2. Plan for a maintenance window and backup the current configuration
  3. 3. Obtain the Pexip Infinity 27.2 or later upgrade package from the official Pexip download portal
  4. 4. Follow the standard Pexip upgrade procedure documented at docs.pexip.com for your deployment type
  5. 5. After upgrade, verify the version shows 27.2 or higher in the admin interface
  6. 6. Test that the conference locking functionality now properly restricts access when a lock is enabled without a PIN

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Pexip Infinity Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-25357 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-25357 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data