Yoo SliderWordPress extension · Yooslider
CVE-2022-25608
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Yoo Slider – Image Slider & Video Slider (WordPress plugin) allows attackers to trick authenticated users into unwanted slider duplicate or delete action.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Yoo Slider WordPress plugin allows authenticated administrators to be tricked into performing unintended duplicate or delete operations on sliders. The plugin fails to properly validate request origin, enabling attackers to craft malicious links that execute actions via the victim's authenticated session without their consent.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Yoo SliderWordPress extension
<= 2.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Yoo Slider plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Yooslider Yoo Slider' or 'Yoo Slider' in the listAffected if The plugin appears in the installed plugins list
-
Check installed plugin versionClick on the plugin name in the Plugins list to view its details, or check the plugin's main PHP file header for 'Version' commentAffected if Version displayed is 2.0.0 or lower (e.g., 2.0.0, 1.x.x, etc.)
-
Confirm WordPress user role exposureVerify that administrator-level users exist in the WordPress site who would be able to access slider management featuresAffected if Administrator accounts exist and have access to WordPress admin dashboard
-
Identify accessible slider endpointsCheck if /wp-admin/admin.php?page=yooslider or similar slider management URLs are accessible to logged-in administratorsAffected if Slider management pages are accessible without additional CSRF tokens being required
Your environment is affected if the Yoo Slider plugin version is 2.0.0 or lower and you have administrator accounts logged into the WordPress admin panel.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to the latest version of the Yoo Slider plugin that includes CSRF protection. Until patched, administrators should avoid clicking untrusted links while logged into the WordPress admin panel.
Fix this in Yoo Slider
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-25608 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-25608 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data