CVE-2022-25623
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Symantec Management Agent is susceptible to a privilege escalation vulnerability. A low privilege local account can be elevated to the SYSTEM level through registry manipulations.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSymantec Management Agent contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability where a low-privileged local user can manipulate registry keys to gain SYSTEM-level privileges. The attacker leverages improper registry permission settings to escalate from a standard user account to the highest local privilege level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.5= 8.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Symantec Management Agent is installedOpen Programs and Features (appwiz.cpl) or check Add/Remove Programs, look for 'Symantec Management Agent' or check the installation directory (commonly C:\Program Files\Symantec\Symantec Management Agent)Affected if The product is not installed on the system - not affected
-
Check installed version numberOpen Registry Editor and navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Symantec\Symantec Management Agent\Agent\ or check version via 'wmic product get name,version' for Symantec Management AgentAffected if Version equals 8.5 or 8.6 - system is running a vulnerable version
-
Identify registry keys with weak permissionsUse regedit to check permissions on registry keys under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Symantec\ (or the specific agent keys identified by your security team). Right-click key > Permissions > verify which users have Write or Full Control access.Affected if Standard user accounts or non-admin users have Write or Full Control permissions on Symantec-related registry keys - vulnerable configuration present
-
Confirm low-privileged user can modify agent registry keysAs a non-administrator test account, attempt to create or modify a registry value under the Symantec Management Agent registry path using reg add commandAffected if Operation succeeds without admin elevation - privilege escalation path is exploitable
System is affected if Symantec Management Agent version 8.5 or 8.6 is installed AND standard users have write access to the vulnerable registry keys.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-provided patch or update to Symantec Management Agent that addresses the registry permission vulnerability, and verify that only authorized administrators have write access to the affected registry keys.
Version 8.7 or later (contact Broadcom Support for exact fixed release)
- Verify the current installed version of Symantec Management Agent by checking Add/Remove Programs or the agent's version information
- Confirm the installation was performed with elevated (administrator) privileges
- Obtain the latest version of Symantec Management Agent from Broadcom Support (support.broadcom.com) - look for version 8.7 or later which contains the fix for CVE-2022-25623
- Back up the current agent configuration and any custom policies
- Uninstall the current Management Agent version 8.5 or 8.6
- Install the updated Management Agent (version 8.7 or newer)
- Verify the installation completed successfully and the agent is communicating with the management server
- Confirm the registry keys related to the agent have appropriate restricted permissions to prevent low-privilege manipulation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-25623 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-25623 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data