CVE-2022-25678
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMemory correction in modem due to buffer overwrite during coap connection
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in modem firmware during CoAP protocol connection handling allows memory corruption. The CVSS 9.8 indicates likely remote code execution capability without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the modem chipset modelCheck the device specifications, firmware metadata, or modem AT command interface (e.g., AT+CGMM or ATI) to determine the exact Qualcomm modem model numberAffected if The modem model matches Mdm8207, Mdm9205, Mdm9206, Mdm9207, Qca4004, Qts110, Snapdragon Wear 1100, or Snapdragon Wear 1200
-
Verify the firmware versionQuery the modem firmware version via AT commands (e.g., AT+CGMR or AT+GMR) or through the device's system informationAffected if Any firmware version is installed on the affected chipset models since all versions are vulnerable
-
Confirm CoAP protocol handling is enabledReview the modem or IoT device configuration to determine if CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol) client or server functionality is actively configured and runningAffected if CoAP protocol handling is enabled and the device is using one of the affected Qualcomm modem chipsets
-
Check for network exposure of CoAP serviceInspect firewall rules, networkACLs, or service bindings to determine if the CoAP service (typically on UDP port 5683) is exposed to untrusted networksAffected if CoAP is network-accessible without proper network segmentation on an affected device
-
Look for exploitation indicatorsMonitor modem or system logs for unexpected crashes, memory corruption events, or unusual network traffic patterns to UDP port 5683 that may indicate attempted exploitationAffected if Signs of memory corruption or unexpected behavior in CoAP connection handling logs on an affected device
A user is affected if their device incorporates any of the listed Qualcomm modem chipsets (Mdm8207, Mdm9205, Mdm9206, Mdm9207, Qca4004, Qts110, Snapdragon Wear 1100, or Snapdragon Wear 1200) with CoAP protocol handling enabled and network accessibility.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware patch for the modem; if no patch exists, consider network segmentation to limit CoAP exposure and monitor for exploitation indicators.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,192.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-25678 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-25678 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data