CVE-2022-25794
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Out-Of-Bounds Read Vulnerability in Autodesk FBX Review version 1.5.2 and prior may lead to code execution through maliciously crafted ActionScript Byte Code 'ABC' files or information disclosure. ABC files are created by the Flash compiler and contain executable code. This vulnerability in conjunction with other vulnerabilities could lead to code execution in the context of the current process.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in Autodesk FBX Review's parsing of ActionScript Byte Code (ABC) files. When the software processes a maliciously crafted ABC file, it reads memory beyond allocated buffer boundaries, leading to potential information disclosure. This vulnerability can be chained with other vulnerabilities to achieve code execution in the context of the current process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.5.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Autodesk FBX Review is installedCheck for the application in the system. On Windows, look in Program Files or Program Files (x86) for 'Autodesk\FBX Review'. On macOS, check /Applications for 'FBX Review.app'. Alternatively, search for the executable named 'FBXReview.exe' (Windows) or the application bundle (macOS).Affected if The software is found on the system, proceed to version check.
-
Identify installed version numberRight-click the FBX Review executable or application bundle and select Properties, then view the Details tab for version information. On Windows, you can also run 'wmic product get name,version' or check the version listed in Add/Remove Programs. On macOS, right-click the app, select Get Info, and check the version field.Affected if Version is present in the output.
-
Compare version to affected rangeCompare the installed version to the affected range. The vulnerability affects versions prior to 1.5.3, meaning versions 1.5.2, 1.5.1, 1.5.0, and earlier are affected.Affected if Installed version is lower than 1.5.3 (for example, 1.5.2, 1.5.1, 1.5.0, or any earlier version).
-
Verify ABC file parsing capability existsThe vulnerability triggers when processing ActionScript Byte Code (ABC) files. Confirm the software can parse ABC files by checking if ABC file type association exists or by attempting to open a sample ABC file if available. The default installation includes ABC parsing functionality.Affected if ABC file parsing is available in the installed version (this is true by default in vulnerable versions).
The environment is affected if Autodesk FBX Review is installed with a version lower than 1.5.3 and the software can parse ABC files, which is the default behavior.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.5.3
Update Autodesk FBX Review to a version newer than 1.5.2. Until patched, avoid opening ABC files from untrusted sources.
FBX Review 1.5.3
- Obtain the fixed version of Autodesk FBX Review (version 1.5.3 or later) from the official Autodesk website or authorized distribution channels
- Uninstall the current version of Autodesk FBX Review if already installed
- Install the updated version (1.5.3 or later) of Autodesk FBX Review
- Verify the installed version matches the fixed release by checking the application version information
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-25794 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-25794 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data