CVE-2022-2595
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Authorization in GitHub repository kromitgmbh/titra prior to 0.79.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceThe vulnerability involves improper authorization in the kromitgmbh/titra time tracking application prior to version 0.79.1. The specific nature of the authorization flaw (e.g., broken access control, IDOR, privilege escalation) is not detailed in the available description, but the CVSS 10 score indicates a network-exploitable flaw requiring no authentication with complete impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 0.79.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Titra versionLocate the version file or check the application's about page, admin dashboard, or API endpoint that returns version information. Common locations include package.json, a /version endpoint, or the footer of the web interface.Affected if The installed version is before 0.79.1 (e.g., 0.79.0, 0.78.x, or any earlier release)
-
Verify network accessibilityDetermine if the Titra application is exposed to the network or internet. Check firewall rules, reverse proxy configuration, or cloud security group settings that control access to the host running Titra.Affected if The application is reachable from untrusted networks without additional authentication or network segmentation
-
Identify exposed API endpointsReview the application's API documentation or inspect network traffic to identify which endpoints handle sensitive operations (user data, settings, administrative functions).Affected if Authorization-related endpoints are accessible without authentication
You are affected if your Titra installation is version 0.79.0 or earlier and the application is network-accessible from untrusted locations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.79.1
Upgrade to kromitgmbh/titra version 0.79.1 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the application and implement additional authentication layers as a temporary compensating control.
0.79.1
- 1. Identify the current Titra version currently deployed
- 2. Review the changes in version 0.79.1 and the specific commit (fe8c3cdeb70e53b9f38f1022186ab16324d332c5) to understand the authorization fix
- 3. Check the official Titra upgrade documentation for version-specific migration instructions
- 4. Create a backup of the current installation including database and configuration
- 5. Test the upgrade in a staging or development environment to verify functionality
- 6. Apply the upgrade to production environment
- 7. Verify that the authorization controls are working correctly after upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,864.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-2595 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-2595 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data