CVE-2022-26504
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper authentication in Veeam Backup & Replication 9.5U3, 9.5U4,10.x and 11.x component used for Microsoft System Center Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM) allows attackers execute arbitrary code via Veeam.Backup.PSManager.exe
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImproper authentication vulnerability in Veeam Backup & Replication's SCVMM integration component (Veeam.Backup.PSManager.exe) allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary code due to insufficient authentication checks in versions 9.5U3, 9.5U4, 10.x, and 11.x.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.0.0.4442, < 10.0.1.4854>= 11.0.0.825, < 11.0.1.1261= 9.5.0.1536= 9.5.4.2615= 10.0.1.4854= 11.0.1.1261CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Veeam Backup & Replication is installedLook for Veeam installation directory in Program Files (typically C:\Program Files\Veeam\Backup and Replication\) or check Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Veeam\Veeam Backup & ReplicationAffected if The product is not installed or the registry keys do not exist, then this CVE does not apply.
-
Identify installed Veeam Backup & Replication versionCheck the file version of Veeam.Backup.PSManager.exe in the installation directory, or read the installed version from the registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\Veeam\Veeam Backup & Replication\VersionAffected if The installed version falls within these affected ranges: 9.5.0.1536, 9.5.4.2615, 10.0.0.4442 through 10.0.1.4854 (inclusive), or 11.0.0.825 through 11.0.1.1261 (inclusive).
-
Confirm SCVMM integration component is presentVerify that the file Veeam.Backup.PSManager.exe exists in the Veeam installation directory (such as in the Backup and Replication\Veeam.Backup.PSManager folder)Affected if The component file exists - if the component is present and the version is in the affected ranges listed above, the system is vulnerable.
-
Check if SCVMM integration is configured or enabledReview Veeam backup infrastructure settings within the Veeam Backup & Replication console for any configured Microsoft System Center Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM) integration pointsAffected if SCVMM integration is configured or the component is actively used - exploitation requires the SCVMM integration to be accessible to remote attackers.
You are affected if Veeam Backup & Replication is installed with a version matching 9.5.0.1536, 9.5.4.2615, 10.0.0.4442 through 10.0.1.4854, or 11.0.0.825 through 11.0.1.1261 AND the SCVMM integration component (Veeam.Backup.PSManager.exe) is present and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.1.485411.0.1.1261
Apply the vendor-supplied patch or upgrade to a patched version of Veeam Backup & Replication to remediate the improper authentication flaw in the SCVMM component.
Veeam Backup & Replication 10.0.1.4854 or 11.0.1.1261 (or later stable release)
- 1. Back up your current Veeam Backup & Replication configuration and data.
- 2. Review the Veeam Backup & Replication Release Notes for version 10.0.1.4854 or 11.0.1.1261 for compatibility and known issues.
- 3. Download the fixed version from the Veeam Customer Portal (veeam.com).
- 4. Run the Veeam Backup & Replication installer and follow the upgrade wizard.
- 5. After upgrade, verify the Veeam.Backup.PSManager.exe component is properly updated and functional.
- 6. Test SCVMM integration to confirm the fix works correctly.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,896.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-26504 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-26504 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data