CVE-2022-26517
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn F5 BIG-IP 15.1.x versions prior to 15.1.5.1, 14.1.x versions prior to 14.1.4.6, and 13.1.x versions prior to 13.1.5, when the BIG-IP CGNAT Large Scale NAT (LSN) pool is configured on a virtual server and packet filtering is enabled, undisclosed requests can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial of service vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP's Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to crash TMM when CGNAT Large Scale NAT (LSN) pool is configured on a virtual server AND packet filtering is enabled. The vulnerability affects specific versions across 13.1.x, 14.1.x, and 15.1.x branches prior to the fixed releases.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 13.1.0= 13.1.1= 13.1.3= 13.1.4= 13.1.5= 14.1.0= 14.1.2= 14.1.3= 14.1.4= 15.1.0= 15.1.1= 15.1.2= 13.1.0= 13.1.1= 13.1.3= 13.1.4= 13.1.5= 14.1.0= 14.1.2= 14.1.3= 14.1.4= 15.1.0= 15.1.1= 15.1.2= 13.1.0= 13.1.1= 13.1.3= 13.1.4= 13.1.5= 14.1.0= 14.1.2= 14.1.3= 14.1.4= 15.1.0= 15.1.1= 15.1.2= 13.1.0= 13.1.1= 13.1.3= 13.1.4= 13.1.5= 14.1.0= 14.1.2= 14.1.3= 14.1.4= 15.1.0= 15.1.1= 15.1.2= 13.1.0= 13.1.1= 13.1.3= 13.1.4= 13.1.5= 14.1.0= 14.1.2= 14.1.3= 14.1.4= 15.1.0= 15.1.1= 15.1.2= 13.1.0= 13.1.1= 13.1.3= 13.1.4= 13.1.5= 14.1.0= 14.1.2= 14.1.3= 14.1.4= 15.1.0= 15.1.1= 15.1.2= 13.1.0= 13.1.1= 13.1.3= 13.1.4= 13.1.5= 14.1.0= 14.1.2= 14.1.3= 14.1.4= 15.1.0= 15.1.1= 15.1.2= 13.1.0= 13.1.1= 13.1.3= 13.1.4= 13.1.5= 14.1.0= 14.1.2= 14.1.3= 14.1.4= 15.1.0= 15.1.1= 15.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify BIG-IP version is within affected rangeRun 'tmsh show sys version' or 'bigpipe version' and compare the output to the affected versions: 13.1.0, 13.1.1, 13.1.3, 13.1.4, 13.1.5, 14.1.0, 14.1.2, 14.1.3, 14.1.4, 15.1.0, 15.1.1, 15.1.2Affected if The installed version matches any of the listed affected versions
-
Identify if CGNAT LSN pools are configuredRun 'tmsh list lsn pool all-properties' to list all Large Scale NAT pools configured on the systemAffected if Any LSN pool is configured and assigned to a virtual server
-
Check if packet filtering is enabledRun 'tmsh list /net packet-filter' or 'tmsh list lsn pool <pool-name>' to inspect packet filtering settings on virtual servers with LSN poolsAffected if Packet filtering is enabled on virtual servers that use LSN pools
A system is affected only if it runs an affected version AND has an LSN pool configured on a virtual server AND packet filtering is enabled on that virtual server.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to BIG-IP 15.1.5.1, 14.1.4.6, or 13.1.5 or later. Alternatively, as a compensating control, disable packet filtering on affected virtual servers or remove LSN pool configurations if upgrade is not immediately feasible.
13.1.5 (or later) for 13.1.x branches; 14.1.4.6 (or later) for 14.1.x branches; 15.1.5.1 (or later) for 15.1.x branches
- Identify the BIG-IP module(s) in use from the affected list (APM, AFM, Analytics, AAM, ASM, DNS, FPS, GTM)
- Determine the current BIG-IP version by running 'tmsh show sys version' or checking the management console
- For BIG-IP 13.1.x: Plan upgrade to version 13.1.5 or later
- For BIG-IP 14.1.x: Plan upgrade to version 14.1.4.6 or later
- For BIG-IP 15.1.x: Plan upgrade to version 15.1.5.1 or later
- Review release notes for the target version for any known issues
- Create a backup of the BIG-IP configuration using 'tmsh save sys config'
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-26517 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-26517 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data