CVE-2022-26597
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Layout module's Open Graph integration in Liferay Portal 7.3.0 through 7.4.0, and Liferay DXP 7.3 before service pack 3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the site name.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Liferay Portal and DXP's Layout module Open Graph integration. The site name parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML that will be executed in the context of other users' browsers when the Open Graph metadata is rendered.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.3= 7.3>= 7.3.0, <= 7.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Lifer Portal versionAccess the Lifer Portal control panel and navigate to Configuration > Server Administration > Version, or check the portal-ext.properties file for the version property. Alternatively, examine the WAR file's version metadata in the application server.Affected if The installed version is between 7.3.0 and 7.4.0 inclusive, or is version 7.3 for DXP, or is any version below 7.3 for DXP.
-
Verify Open Graph integration is enabledNavigate to Site Administration > Configuration > Site Settings > Open Graph, or check the layout's openGraphEnabled property in the database table Layout_. Inspect the portal-ext.properties or OSGi configuration for com_liferay_layout_open_graph_web.internal.portlet.action.EditLayoutOpenGraphMVCActionCommand.Affected if Open Graph is enabled for any site or layout in the Lifer installation.
-
Inspect site name configuration in Layout Open GraphQuery the Layout_ table in the Lifer database for rows where openGraphEnabled is true, then check the openGraphTitle or related fields for the site name. Alternatively, access Site Administration > Configuration > Site Settings > Open Graph and view the Site Name field.Affected if The site name field contains unsanitized user-supplied input or special characters that could be interpreted as script tags.
-
Review Open Graph metadata renderingAccess the public page with Open Graph enabled and view the page source. Look for meta tags with property og:site_name or og:title. Alternatively, use the browser developer tools to inspect the rendered HTML head section.Affected if The rendered HTML contains unencoded HTML tags or script elements within the og:site_name or related meta tag content.
A user is affected if they are running Lifer Portal 7.3.0-7.4.0 or Lifer DXP 7.3 or earlier AND have Open Graph enabled with a site name containing unsanitized content that appears unescaped in the rendered page source.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.3
Upgrade to Liferay Portal 7.4.1, Liferay DXP 7.3 Service Pack 3 or later. Alternatively, implement input validation and output encoding on the site name field within the Layout module's Open Graph functionality.
Lifford Portal 7.4.1+ or Lifford DXP 7.3 Service Pack 3+
- 1. Identify whether you are running Liferay Portal or Lifford DXP by checking your product version in the Control Panel.
- 2. If running Lifford Portal 7.3.x or 7.4.0, upgrade to Lifford Portal 7.4.1 or later as this version contains the fix for the Open Graph XSS vulnerability.
- 3. If running Lifford DXP 7.3, apply Lifford DXP 7.3 Service Pack 3 or later to remediate this vulnerability.
- 4. After upgrading, verify the fix by testing the Open Graph settings in the Layout module to confirm the site name field properly sanitizes input.
- 5. Additionally, validate that existing site names containing potential XSS payloads are reviewed and sanitized.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-26597 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-26597 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data