Open Journal SystemsApplication · Public Knowledge Project

CVE-2022-26616

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-04-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.3.0-9 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
PKP Vendor Open Journal System v2.4.8 to v3.3.8 allows attackers to perform reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via crafted HTTP headers.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Open Journal Systems (OJS) versions 2.4.8 through 3.3.8 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability where malicious script can be injected via crafted HTTP headers. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of a user's browser by sending specially crafted header values that are reflected back in the application's response without proper sanitization.

MitigationUpgrade OJS to version 3.3.8.1 or later which contains the security patch. Until patching is feasible, implement WAF rules to filter malicious header content and enable HTTP header validation at the web server level.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Open Journal SystemsApplication
Affected:>= 2.4.8, < 3.3.0-9

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify OJS installation version
    Check the version file at lib/pkp/VERSION, or look at the footer of any OJS admin page, or view config.php for a version entry, or access the About page at /about
    Affected if The installed version is 2.4.8 or higher but lower than 3.3.0-9
  2. Confirm the version falls within vulnerable range
    Compare your identified version against the affected range: >= 2.4.8 and < 3.3.0-9
    Affected if Your version matches this range indicating the unpatched software is present
  3. Verify HTTP header reflection is possible
    Send a crafted HTTP request with a malicious script in a header (such as User-Agent, Referer, or custom header) and observe if the value is reflected unsanitized in the response
    Affected if The application reflects your injected header value back in the HTML response without encoding or sanitization

You are affected if your OJS installation version is between 2.4.8 and 3.3.0-9 inclusive, and the application reflects HTTP header values into its responses without proper sanitization.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.3.0-9 or later
Fixed in 3.3.0-9
Interim mitigation

Upgrade OJS to version 3.3.8.1 or later which contains the security patch. Until patching is feasible, implement WAF rules to filter malicious header content and enable HTTP header validation at the web server level.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

3.3.0-10 or later (ensure version is >= 3.3.0-9)

  1. 1. Back up your current Open Journal Systems installation and database
  2. 2. Download the fixed version (3.3.0-10 or later from the PKP website or GitHub releases)
  3. 3. Extract the new version files to your server
  4. 4. Update your OJS installation by replacing the core files, preserving your config file and any customizations
  5. 5. Clear any application caches
  6. 6. Verify the application is functioning correctly
  7. 7. Test that HTTP header injection no longer executes arbitrary JavaScript
Caveat Review release notes for any backward-incompatible changes between your current version and the target upgrade version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Open Journal Systems Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-26616 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-26616 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data