CVE-2022-27181
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn F5 BIG-IP APM 16.1.x versions prior to 16.1.2.2, 15.1.x versions prior to 15.1.5.1, 14.1.x versions prior to 14.1.4.6, 13.1.x versions prior to 13.1.5, and all versions of 12.1.x and 11.6.x, when APM is configured on a virtual server and the associated access profile is configured with APM AAA NTLM Auth, undisclosed requests can cause an increase in internal resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceWhen F5 BIG-IP APM is configured on a virtual server with an access profile using APM AAA NTLM authentication, certain undisclosed requests can trigger excessive internal resource utilization, potentially leading to denial of service. The vulnerability stems from how NTLM authentication handles specific request patterns.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 13.1.0= 13.1.1= 13.1.3= 13.1.4= 13.1.5= 14.1.0= 14.1.2= 14.1.3= 14.1.4= 15.1.0= 15.1.1= 15.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or check the web UI under System > Software Management > BIG-IP Version to identify the installed versionAffected if The installed version matches one of: 13.1.0, 13.1.1, 13.1.3, 13.1.4, 13.1.5, 14.1.0, 14.1.2, 14.1.3, 14.1.4, 15.1.0, 15.1.1, 15.1.2
-
Verify APM module is licensedRun 'tmsh show sys module' or check the web UI under System > License to confirm Access Policy Manager is licensed and enabledAffected if APM module shows as licensed and enabled
-
Identify virtual servers with access profilesRun 'tmsh list ltm virtual one-access' to list all virtual servers that have an access profile assigned, or check each virtual server's configuration in the web UI under Local Traffic > Virtual ServersAffected if Any virtual server has an access profile configured (one-access value is not 'none')
-
Check access profiles for NTLM AAA configurationRun 'tmsh list apm profile access <profile_name>' for each access profile, or view the access profile in the web UI under Access Policy > Access Profiles and navigate to the AAA NTLM settingsAffected if An access profile has NTLM authentication enabled in its AAA NTLM configuration
The environment is affected if BIG-IP runs an affected version listed above, APM is licensed, and an access profile using NTLM authentication is assigned to any virtual server.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade BIG-IP to fixed versions (16.1.2.2, 15.1.5.1, 14.1.4.6, or 13.1.5) or disable NTLM authentication in APM access profiles if not required.
BIG-IP APM 13.1.5 or later (13.1.x branch)
- 1. Back up the current BIG-IP configuration using 'tmsh save sys config' or the configuration utility
- 2. Download BIG-IP APM version 13.1.5 or later from the F5 Networks download site (support.f5.com)
- 3. Upload the ISO image to the BIG-IP device
- 4. Verify the image integrity using the MD5/SHA256 checksum provided by F5
- 5. Install the upgrade using 'tmsh install sys software volume' or the configuration utility
- 6. Reboot the device to boot from the new software volume
- 7. After reboot, verify the new version is running: 'tmsh show sys version'
- 8. Confirm the APM AAA NTLM Auth functionality is working correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-27181 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-27181 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data