CVE-2022-27188
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOS command injection vulnerability exists in CENTUM VP R4.01.00 to R4.03.00, CENTUM VP Small R4.01.00 to R4.03.00, CENTUM VP Basic R4.01.00 to R4.03.00, and B/M9000 VP R6.01.01 to R6.03.02, which may allow an attacker who can access the computer where the affected product is installed to execute an arbitrary OS command by altering a file generated using Graphic Builder.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in Yokogawa CENTUM VP and B/M9000 VP allows local attackers with computer access to execute arbitrary OS commands by modifying files generated by Graphic Builder, a configuration tool for the HMI/SCADA system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= r6.01.01, <= r6.03.02>= r4.01.00, <= r4.03.00CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Yokogawa productCheck system inventory or installed programs for Yokogawa B/M9000 VP or CENTUM VPAffected if Product is either B/M9000 VP or CENTUM VP
-
Determine the product versionUse system information, installed programs list, or check version information in the Yokogawa application (typically via Help > About or check version files in the installation directory)Affected if Version is B/M9000 VP r6.01.01 through r6.03.02 inclusive, or CENTUM VP r4.01.00 through r4.03.00 inclusive
-
Confirm Graphic Builder is installed and accessibleLocate Graphic Builder executable in the Yokogawa installation directory (commonly in a 'GraphicBuilder' or 'GB' subfolder)Affected if Graphic Builder component is present on the system
-
Check file permissions on Graphic Builder output filesExamine file permissions on files generated by Graphic Builder (typically .gbf, .gbl or similar graphic configuration files in the project directory)Affected if Files are writable by users with computer access who should not have write permission
The environment is affected if Yokogawa B/M9000 VP r6.01.01-r6.03.02 or CENTUM VP r4.01.00-r4.03.00 is installed with accessible Graphic Builder functionality.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedRestrict physical and logical access to systems running affected CENTUM VP versions; contact Yokogawa for patched versions or vendor guidance on securing Graphic Builder file handling.
B/M9000 VP: upgrade to r6.03.03 or later | Centum VP: upgrade to r4.03.01 or later (consult Yokogawa for exact fixed version)
- Check the official Yokogawa security advisory at www.yokogawa.com or JVN (jvn.jp) for the specific fixed version numbers and patch availability.
- For B/M9000 VP: Upgrade from versions r6.01.01 through r6.03.02 to the latest available version (r6.03.03 or later) that includes the security fix.
- For Centum VP (including Small and Basic variants): Upgrade from versions r4.01.00 through r4.03.00 to the latest available version (r4.03.01 or later) that includes the security fix.
- Verify the upgrade in a test environment before deploying to production.
- After upgrading, ensure that access controls are in place since the advisory notes the attacker needs local access to the computer where the product is installed.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-27188 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-27188 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data