CVE-2022-27579
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA deserialization vulnerability in a .NET framework class used and not properly checked by Flexi Soft Designer in all versions up to and including 1.9.4 SP1 allows an attacker to craft malicious project files. Opening/importing such a malicious project file would execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the current user when opened or imported by the Flexi Soft Designer. This compromises confidentiality integrity and availability. For the attack to succeed a user must manually open a malicious project file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFlexi Soft Designer contains a deserialization vulnerability in a .NET framework class used for processing project files. The application does not properly validate or sanitize data during deserialization, allowing specially crafted malicious project files to deserialize and execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the user who opens the file.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.9.4= 1.9.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Flexi Soft Designer installationOpen Windows Control Panel > Programs and Features, or check the installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\SICK\Flexi Soft Designer\) for the executable file.Affected if The application is installed on this system.
-
Determine the installed version numberRight-click on the Flexi Soft Designer executable (e.g., FlexiSoftDesigner.exe) and select Properties > Details to view the File Version. Alternatively, in Programs and Features, locate the entry and note the version shown.Affected if The version displayed is lower than 1.9.4, or shows exactly 1.9.4.
-
Verify the specific version against affected rangeCompare your identified version to the affected range: versions < 1.9.4 and version = 1.9.4 are vulnerable. Versions 1.9.4 SP1 or later are not affected.Affected if Your installed version is 1.9.4 or any earlier version (e.g., 1.9.3, 1.9.2, 1.8.x, etc.).
-
Assess project file handling practicesIdentify where project files (.fsp or similar extensions used by Flexi Soft Designer) are stored and whether users routinely open files from external or untrusted sources.Affected if Users open project files received from external parties or unknown sources without verification.
Your environment is affected if Flexi Soft Designer version 1.9.4 or any earlier version is installed and users may open project files from untrusted sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.9.4
Upgrade Flexi Soft Designer to a version beyond 1.9.4 SP1 that patches this vulnerability. Until patched, users should not open project files from untrusted sources.
Flexi Soft Designer version greater than 1.9.4 SP1 (contact SICK support for exact fixed release)
- 1. Navigate to the SICK software download page or contact SICK support to obtain the latest version of Flexi Soft Designer
- 2. Download the fixed version of Flexi Soft Designer (version higher than 1.9.4 SP1)
- 3. Uninstall the current vulnerable version of Flexi Soft Designer
- 4. Install the newly downloaded fixed version
- 5. Verify the installation by opening Flexi Soft Designer and confirming the version number
- 6. Do not open any untrusted or unknown project files in Flexi Soft Designer to avoid potential deserialization attacks
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-27579 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-27579 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data