CVE-2022-27871
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAutodesk AutoCAD product suite, Revit, Design Review and Navisworks releases using PDFTron prior to 9.1.17 version may be used to write beyond the allocated buffer while parsing PDF files. This vulnerability may be exploited to execute arbitrary code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in PDFTron library versions prior to 9.1.17 used by multiple Autodesk products (AutoCAD, Revit, Design Review, and Navisworks). When parsing specially crafted PDF files, the software writes data beyond the allocated buffer boundary, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code via controlled memory overwrite.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2021= 2022= 2019= 2020= 2021= 2022= 2019= 2020= 2021= 2022= 2019= 2020= 2021= 2022= 2019= 2020= 2021= 2022= 2019= 2020= 2021= 2022= 2019= 2020= 2021= 2022= 2019= 2020= 2021= 2022CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Autodesk productsOpen Programs and Features (Windows) or check application list to see if any of these are installed: 3ds Max, Advance Steel, AutoCAD, AutoCAD Architecture, AutoCAD Civil 3D, AutoCAD Electrical, AutoCAD LT, or AutoCAD Map 3DAffected if Any of these products are installed and the version is 2019, 2020, 2021, or 2022
-
Determine product versionFor each installed product, check the version: In AutoCAD products, type ABOUT at the command prompt; in 3ds Max go to Help > About; in Advance Steel check the About dialogAffected if The installed version matches 2019, 2020, 2021, or 2022
-
Verify PDF functionality is in useConfirm the product is configured to open or process PDF files, or check if PDF-related modules or plugins are loadedAffected if PDF file handling or PDF import/export features are enabled or regularly used in the product
-
Check PDFTron library versionIf accessible, inspect the PDFTron library file version in the product's bin or support folder; otherwise, rely on product version as indirect indicatorAffected if PDFTron library version is earlier than 9.1.17 or cannot be verified to be 9.1.17 or later
The environment is affected if an Autodesk product from the 2019-2022 version range is installed and processes PDF files using a PDFTron library version prior to 9.1.17
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate PDFTron library to version 9.1.17 or later, or apply Autodesk-supplied patches for the affected products. Prioritize systems that process untrusted PDF files.
Autodesk product versions that bundle PDFTron 9.1.17 or later (contact Autodesk or check product release notes for specific version numbers)
- Identify the specific Autodesk product (e.g., AutoCAD, 3ds Max, Advance Steel, etc.) affected in your environment
- Check the current version of the installed Autodesk product
- Upgrade the Autodesk product to a version that includes PDFTron version 9.1.17 or later. Autodesk typically bundles PDFTron updates within their product updates/patches
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the product version or release notes
- Ensure the updated PDFTron version is 9.1.17 or higher by consulting Autodesk release documentation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-27871 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-27871 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data