CVE-2022-28218
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in CipherMail Webmail Messenger 1.1.1 through 4.1.4. A local attacker could access secret keys (found in a Roundcube configuration file) that are used to protect Webmail user passwords and two-factor authentication (2FA).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA local attacker with access to the CipherMail server can read secret keys stored in a Roundcube configuration file in versions 1.1.1 through 4.1.4. These keys protect Webmail user passwords and two-factor authentication credentials, allowing the attacker to potentially decrypt or bypass authentication mechanisms.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.1.1, < 4.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed version of CipherMail Webmail MessengerRun the command to retrieve the installed package version (for example: dpkg -l ciphermail-webmail-messenger or rpm -qi ciphermail-webmail-messenger, depending on your package manager). Compare the version number to the affected range: 1.1.1 through 4.1.4.Affected if The installed version is 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5, 1.1.6, 1.1.7, 1.1.8, 1.1.9, 1.1.10, 1.1.11, 1.1.12, or any version from 4.0.0 through 4.1.4 inclusive.
-
Locate the Roundcube configuration fileIdentify the Roundcube configuration directory in your CipherMail Webmail installation. Common locations include /etc/roundcube, /opt/ciphermail/webmail/config, or within the webmail document root under config/. Look for the main.php or config.php file.Affected if Roundcube configuration file exists and contains secret key definitions (look for variables such as $rcmail_config['cipher'], $config['secret_key'], $rcmail_config['des_key'], or similar encryption-related configuration parameters).
-
Inspect the configuration for exposed secret keysOpen the Roundcube configuration file and search for encryption keys, DES keys, or secret keys used for password protection. Look for parameters like des_key, password encryption keys, or 2FA secret storage keys.Affected if The configuration file contains plaintext or base64-encoded secret keys used to protect Webmail user passwords and two-factor authentication credentials.
-
Check file permissions on the configuration fileRun ls -la on the Roundcube configuration file to inspect its permissions. Also check the parent directory permissions.Affected if The configuration file is readable by users other than the webmail service account (for example, permissions are 644 or more permissive, or the file is owned by a shared group with broad read access).
A user is affected if CipherMail Webmail Messenger version is between 1.1.1 and 4.1.4 inclusive AND the Roundcube configuration file containing secret encryption keys is accessible to unauthorized local users due to overly permissive file permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.2.1
Rotate all exposed secret keys used for password and 2FA protection, restrict file permissions on configuration files to limit local access, and consider moving sensitive keys outside the web-accessible directory.
4.2.1
- Download Webmail Messenger version 4.2.1 or later from the official CipherMail repository
- Stop the Webmail Messenger service
- Upgrade the installation to version 4.2.1 or newer using the standard upgrade procedure
- Restart the Webmail Messenger service
- Verify that the secret keys in the Roundcube configuration file are no longer world-readable by checking file permissions (should be 600 or similar restrictive permissions)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-28218 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-28218 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data