CVE-2022-28620
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA remote authentication bypass vulnerability was discovered in HPE Cray Legacy Shasta System Solutions; HPE Slingshot; and HPE Cray EX supercomputers versions: Prior to node controller firmware associated with HPE Cray EX liquid cooled blades, and all versions of chassis controller firmware associated with HPE Cray EX liquid cooled cabinets prior to 1.6.27/1.5.33/1.4.27; All Slingshot versions prior to 1.7.2; All versions of node controller firmware associated with HPE Cray EX liquid cooled blades, and all versions of chassis controller firmware associated with HPE Cray EX liquid cooled cabinets prior to 1.6.27/1.5.33/1.4.27. HPE has provided a software update to resolve this vulnerability in HPE Cray Legacy Shasta System Solutions, HPE Slingshot, and HPE Cray EX Supercomputers.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA remote authentication bypass vulnerability in HPE Cray EX and Slingshot supercomputer systems allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass authentication controls via the node controller and chassis controller firmware. The vulnerability affects firmware versions prior to 1.6.27/1.5.33/1.4.27 for liquid cooled components and prior to 1.7.2 for Slingshot.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.7.2= 1.4.27= 1.5.33= 1.6.27= 1.4.27= 1.5.33= 1.6.27= 1.4.27= 1.5.33= 1.6.27= 1.4.27= 1.5.33= 1.6.27CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify HPE Cray EX or Slingshot system typeDetermine if your environment includes HPE Cray EX supercomputers or HPE Slingshot switch firmware. Consult system inventory or hardware management documentation.Affected if Your environment does not include any HPE Cray EX or Slingshot hardware.
-
Locate node controller firmware versionAccess the node controller firmware through the system management interface (BMC/IPMI or HPE Cray management tools). Query the firmware version using 'cray-firmware' commands or via the hardware management console.Affected if The node controller firmware version is < 1.4.27, < 1.5.33, or < 1.6.27 for liquid cooled systems, or < 1.7.2 for Slingshot.
-
Locate chassis controller firmware versionAccess the chassis controller firmware through the system management interface. Query the firmware version using HPE Cray firmware management tools or through the Redfish API endpoint for chassis controllers.Affected if The chassis controller firmware version is < 1.4.27, < 1.5.33, or < 1.6.27 for liquid cooled systems, or < 1.7.2 for Slingshot.
-
Verify liquid cooled vs air cooled configurationCheck the specific cooling configuration of your HPE Cray EX or HPE Cray Sh system through hardware inventory or management interfaces.Affected if The system uses liquid cooled components with firmware versions prior to 1.6.27/1.5.33/1.4.27.
You are affected if your environment contains HPE Cray EX or Slingshot hardware with node controller or chassis controller firmware versions below 1.4.27, 1.5.33, or 1.6.27 (for liquid cooled) or below 1.7.2 (for Slingshot).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.7.2
Apply the HPE-provided software/firmware updates to node controller and chassis controller firmware across all affected HPE Cray EX liquid cooled blades, cabinets, and Slingshot switches to remediate the authentication bypass.
Slingshot: 1.7.2 or later | Cray EX/Cray Sh: 1.6.27 (or 1.5.33/1.4.27 depending on baseline version)
- Identify the specific HPE Cray system model (Slingshot switch, Cray EX compute node, or chassis controller) requiring remediation
- Access the HPE support portal at support.hpe.com and locate the appropriate firmware update for your system
- For Slingshot systems: Download and apply firmware version 1.7.2 or later
- For Cray EX liquid cooled blades: Update node controller firmware to version 1.6.27 or later (or 1.5.33/1.4.27 depending on baseline)
- For Cray EX liquid cooled cabinets: Update chassis controller firmware to version 1.6.27 or later (or 1.5.33/1.4.27 depending on baseline)
- Verify the firmware update was successfully applied by checking the firmware version post-update
- Confirm that remote authentication functionality is working correctly after the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-28620 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-28620 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data