OneviewApplication · Hp

CVE-2022-28625

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Developing Published 2022-08-31
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.60.01 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A local disclosure of sensitive information vulnerability was discovered in HPE OneView version(s): Prior to 7.0 or 6.60.01. A low privileged user could locally exploit this vulnerability to disclose sensitive information resulting in a complete loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. To exploit this vulnerability, HPE OneView must be configured with credential access to external repositories. HPE has provided a software update to resolve this vulnerability in HPE OneView.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · low confidence
Developing — this CVE was published recently and its authoritative NVD entry is still being established, so we're holding a technical summary until the source data settles rather than publish something unreliable. Re-checking after 2026-08-02.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OneviewApplication
Affected:< 6.60.01

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.60.01 or later
Fixed in 6.60.01
Recommended fix High confidence

HPE OneView 6.60.01 or 7.0

  1. 1. Identify the current HPE OneView version by accessing the appliance console or web interface
  2. 2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
  3. 3. Back up the current HPE OneView configuration and database
  4. 4. Download the HPE OneView 6.60.01 (or 7.0) upgrade package from support.hpe.com
  5. 5. Follow HPE OneView upgrade documentation to apply the software update
  6. 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number in the OneView interface
  7. 7. Validate that external repository credentials are still properly configured
Caveat Review HPE OneView 7.0 release notes for any new requirements or deprecated features before upgrading to that major version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can perform the upgrade in your staging environment and verify nothing breaks — typical engagement from $1,600. Get the upgrade done

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-28625 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-28625 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data