CVE-2022-28670
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThis vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of AcroForms. Crafted data in an AcroForm can trigger a read past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16523.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOut-of-bounds read vulnerability in Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537 when processing crafted AcroForm data. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to read past the end of an allocated buffer, potentially disclosing sensitive information. While user interaction is required (opening a malicious PDF), the flaw can be chained with other vulnerabilities to achieve arbitrary code execution in the current process context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 10.1.7.37777>= 11.0, <= 11.2.1.53537<= 11.2.1.53537CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Foxit productCheck for Foxit PDF Reader or Foxit PDF Editor in installed programs. On Windows, check 'Programs and Features' or registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\ or HKLM\SOFTWARE\WOW6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\Affected if Either Foxit PDF Reader or Foxit PDF Editor is present on the system
-
Determine installed version numberOpen Foxit, go to Help > About Foxit PDF Reader/Editor, or check the executable properties of foxitreader.exe or foxitpdfeditor.exe in the installation directoryAffected if The displayed version falls within the affected ranges: <= 10.1.7.37777 OR (>= 11.0 AND <= 11.2.1.53537)
-
Verify AcroForm feature is accessibleAttempt to open a PDF with AcroForm fields or check if AcroForm support is loaded. In Foxit, go to File > Properties > Forms to see if any forms are present, or verify the 'AcroForm' plugin is loaded in the Foxit plugins directoryAffected if AcroForm functionality is available and the user can open PDF files containing AcroForm data
-
Check JavaScript execution statusIn Foxit, go to Edit > Preferences > JavaScript. Also check File > Properties > Security for script permissionsAffected if JavaScript execution is enabled, which increases the severity if a malicious PDF is opened
A user is affected if Foxit PDF Reader or Foxit PDF Editor is installed with a version matching <= 10.1.7.37777 or >= 11.0 through 11.2.1.53537, and AcroForm processing is accessible when opening untrusted PDFs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Foxit PDF Reader to the latest version and avoid opening untrusted PDF files or visiting malicious pages. Disable JavaScript execution in the PDF reader as an additional hardening measure.
Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.2 or later; Foxit PDF Editor 11.2.2 or later (for 11.x branch) and Foxit PDF Editor 10.1.8 or later (for 10.x branch)
- Download the latest version of Foxit PDF Reader or PDF Editor from the official Foxit website (www.foxit.com)
- Uninstall the current version of Foxit PDF Reader or PDF Editor
- Install the updated version that contains the security fix for CVE-2022-28670
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-28670 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-28670 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data