CVE-2022-28732
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA carefully crafted request on WeblogPlugin could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. Apache JSPWiki users should upgrade to 2.11.3 or later.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache JSPWiki versions prior to 2.11.3 contain a stored XSS vulnerability in the WeblogPlugin component. By sending a specially crafted request, an attacker can inject malicious JavaScript that executes in victims' browsers, potentially exfiltrating session tokens, cookies, or other sensitive information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.11.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify JSPWiki installation and versionLocate the JSPWiki installation and check the version. Typically found in a version file, about page, or the war file name. Common locations include the /about.jsp page or the jspwikiWARName.properties file.Affected if The installed version is any release prior to 2.11.3 (e.g., 2.11.2, 2.11.1, 2.11.0, 2.10.x, etc.)
-
Determine if WeblogPlugin is enabledCheck the JSPWiki configuration files (jspwiki.properties or jspwiki.xml) for the WeblogPlugin module. Look for entries like 'WeblogPlugin' in the plugin configuration or the plugin's class name.Affected if WeblogPlugin is loaded and active in the JSPWiki configuration; the vulnerability only affects systems where this plugin is enabled.
-
Inspect weblogs for suspicious contentAccess the WeblogPlugin functionality (typically at /weblog/ paths) and review recent blog entries and comments for unexpected HTML, script tags, or JavaScript payloads. Check the underlying data store or file system for blog content files.Affected if Any blog entries or comments contain unescaped HTML, script tags, or JavaScript code that was not authored by an administrator, indicating potential XSS injection.
-
Review server logs for XSS attack patternsExamine JSPWiki server logs (catalina.out, jspwiki.log, or similar) for entries containing patterns like '<script>', 'javascript:', 'onerror=', 'onload=', or other typical XSS payloads submitted to WeblogPlugin endpoints.Affected if Logs show requests with XSS payloads directed at WeblogPlugin URLs, suggesting the vulnerability may have been exploited.
The environment is affected if the installed JSPWiki version is below 2.11.3 AND the WeblogPlugin component is enabled and accessible to users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.11.3
Upgrade Apache JSPWiki to version 2.11.3 or later. Until the upgrade is applied, consider disabling the WeblogPlugin or implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate XSS execution.
2.11.3 or later
- 1. Back up your existing JSPWiki installation, including the WAR file, configuration files (jspwiki.properties), and wiki data directory
- 2. Download Apache JSPWiki version 2.11.3 or later from the official Apache repository (https://jspwiki-wiki.apache.org/)
- 3. Stop the JSPWiki web application service
- 4. Replace the existing JSPWiki WAR file with the new version 2.11.3+
- 5. Restore your backed-up configuration files (jspwiki.properties) and wiki data to the new installation
- 6. Restart the JSPWiki web application service
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful by logging in and confirming the WeblogPlugin functions correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,904.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-28732 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-28732 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data