CVE-2022-29036
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJenkins Credentials Plugin 1111.v35a_307992395 and earlier, except 1087.1089.v2f1b_9a_b_040e4, 1074.1076.v39c30cecb_0e2, and 2.6.1.1, does not escape the name and description of Credentials parameters on views displaying parameters, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Item/Configure permission.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Jenkins Credentials Plugin versions 1111.v35a_307992395 and earlier allows attackers with Item/Configure permission to inject malicious scripts through the name and description fields of Credentials parameters, which are not properly escaped when rendered on view pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.6.1.1>= 1055.v1346ba467ba1, < 1074.1076.v39c30cecb_0e2>= 1105.vb_4e24a_c78b_81, < 1112.vc87b_7a_3597f6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Jenkins Credentials Plugin versionNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'Credentials' plugin, or use the Jenkins CLI: java -jar jenkins-cli.jar list-plugins | grep credentialsAffected if The installed version falls into any of these ranges: < 2.6.1.1, >= 1055.v1346ba467ba1 and < 1074.1076.v39c30cecb_0e2, or >= 1105.vb_4e24a_c78b_81 and < 1112.vc87b_7a_3597f6
-
Verify if credentials exist with custom name or descriptionNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Credentials and review any stored credentials. Check the 'Name' and 'Description' fields for any non-standard or user-supplied values.Affected if Credentials exist where the name or description field contains content that could have been injected by a user with Item/Configure permission
-
Confirm presence of users with Item/Configure permissionNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Users or check Jenkins authorization matrix for users granted Item/Configure or Credentials/Create permissionsAffected if Any user account or group has Item/Configure or Credentials/Create permissions, as this is required to exploit the vulnerability
-
Inspect credential view pages for potential XSSAccess the credential details pages (typically at /credentials/ or within job configurations) and view the page source or use browser developer tools to inspect whether name and description fields are properly HTML-encodedAffected if The name or description fields render as raw HTML/JavaScript without escaping (e.g., <script> tags appear literally in the page source)
If the Credentials Plugin version is in the affected ranges AND credentials with user-supplied name/description exist AND users with Item/Configure permission are present, the environment is vulnerable to stored XSS.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.6.1.11074.1076.v39c30cecb_0e21112.vc87b_7a_3597f6
Update Jenkins Credentials Plugin to version 1087.1089.v2f1b_9a_b_040e4, 1074.1076.v39c30cecb_0e2, 2.6.1.1, or any later patched version to remediate the XSS vulnerability.
Upgrade to Jenkins Credentials Plugin 1087.1089.v2f1b_9a_b_040e4 or later
- Check current installed version of Jenkins Credentials plugin in Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed
- If running a version < 2.6.1.1, or between 1055.v1346ba467ba1 and 1074.1076.v39c30cecb_0e2 (exclusive), or between 1105.vb_4e24a_c78b_81 and 1112.vc87b_7a_3597f6 (exclusive), the instance is vulnerable
- Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Available
- Locate Credentials plugin and select Update, or upload the new .hpi file from the Jenkins security advisory
- Restart Jenkins or wait for plugin to reload
- Verify the new version is 1087.1089.v2f1b_9a_b_040e4 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-29036 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-29036 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data