CVE-2022-29038
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJenkins Extended Choice Parameter Plugin 346.vd87693c5a_86c and earlier does not escape the name and description of Extended Choice parameters on views displaying parameters, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Item/Configure permission.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins Extended Choice Parameter Plugin fails to properly escape HTML in the name and description fields of Extended Choice parameters when rendering them on parameter display views. This allows an attacker with Item/Configure permission to inject malicious JavaScript code that gets stored and executed in the browsers of other users who view the affected parameter pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 346.vd87693c5a_86cCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Extended Choice Parameter Plugin is installedGo to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed and search for 'Extended Choice Parameter', or run: jenkins-cli.jar who-am-i or check $JENKINS_HOME/plugins for extended-choice-parameter*Affected if Plugin is not installed - not affected. If installed, check version against <= 346.vd87693c5a_86c
-
Identify jobs using Extended Choice parametersNavigate to each job's configuration page and look for parameter definitions, or search job config.xml files for '<hudson.plugins.extendedchoiceparameter.ExtendedChoiceParameterDefinition>'Affected if No jobs use Extended Choice parameters - not affected (vulnerability only applies to configured parameters)
-
Inspect parameter names and descriptions for injected codeIn job configuration, examine every Extended Choice parameter's 'Name' and 'Description' fields. Look for HTML tags, <script> elements, event handlers (onclick, onerror, etc.), or javascript: URLsAffected if Any Extended Choice parameter name or description contains raw HTML, script tags, or JavaScript code - potentially affected and exploited
-
Verify View permission exposes parameters to victimsCheck if jobs with Extended Choice parameters are visible to users without Item/Configure permission. View the parameter build page as a non-privileged user to confirm renderingAffected if Untrusted users can view parameter pages where injected scripts would execute in their browsers
You are affected if the Extended Choice Parameter Plugin version is <= 346.vd87693c5a_86c AND you have jobs with Extended Choice parameters whose names or descriptions contain unescaped HTML or script content that could execute in other users' browsers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the Extended Choice Parameter Plugin to version 346.vd87693c5a_86c or later, which includes proper HTML escaping for parameter names and descriptions. Alternatively, restrict Item/Configure permission to trusted users only until the update can be applied.
Extended Choice Parameter plugin version > 346.vd87693c5a_86c (upgrade to latest stable version)
- Navigate to Jenkins dashboard
- Go to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins
- Select the 'Updates' tab
- Locate 'Extended Choice Parameter' plugin in the list
- If an update is available, select the plugin and click 'Download now and install after restart'
- Wait for the plugin to update to a secure version
- Restart Jenkins to complete the installation
- Alternatively, manually download the updated .hpi file from the Jenkins plugin repository and install via 'Advanced' > 'Upload Plugin'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-29038 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-29038 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data