CVE-2022-29056
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability [CWE-307] in Fortinet FortiMail version 6.4.0, version 6.2.0 through 6.2.4 and before 6.0.9 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to partially exhaust CPU and memory via sending numerous HTTP requests to the login form.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortiMail login form lacks proper rate limiting or account lockout mechanisms, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to send numerous HTTP requests that partially exhaust CPU and memory resources, causing denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.10>= 6.2.1, < 6.2.5= 6.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiMail version via CLIConnect to FortiMail CLI and run: `get system status` or `fortimail -v` to retrieve the installed firmware version.Affected if The displayed version falls within these ranges: 6.0.0 through 6.0.9, 6.2.1 through 6.2.4, or exactly 6.4.0. Any version in these ranges is vulnerable.
-
Verify login interface is exposedConfirm the FortiMail web login page is reachable over HTTP/HTTPS from the network segment being assessed. Access the URL `https://<fortimail-ip>/mail/` or check the listening ports on the FortiMail device using `diagnose system interface list` or `show system interface` to identify exposed management or web mail ports.Affected if The login form is accessible via network. The vulnerability applies to any deployment where the login form is network-accessible, regardless of whether it is exposed to the internet or internal networks.
-
Check for existing rate limiting configurationIn FortiMail CLI, examine rate limit or account lockout settings: `get system global` or search for related settings under `config system global`. Look for parameters like `max-login-attempts` or rate-limiting configurations.Affected if Rate limiting is not configured or is set to an excessively high value/none. The vulnerability exists specifically because these protections are missing or inadequate in affected versions.
A defender is affected if their FortiMail version is 6.0.0-6.0.9, 6.2.1-6.2.4, or exactly 6.4.0 AND the login interface is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.0.106.2.5
Apply vendor patches for FortiMail versions 6.0.9, 6.2.5, 6.4.1 or later. Consider implementing upstream rate limiting or WAF rules for the login endpoint as additional mitigation.
FortiMail 6.0.10, 6.2.5, or 6.4.1 and later
- Identify your current FortiMail version from the web UI (System > Dashboard > Status) or CLI: 'get system status'
- Backup your FortiMail configuration using: 'execute backup config tftp <config-file> <tftp-server-ip>'
- For FortiMail 6.0.x: Upgrade to version 6.0.10 or later
- For FortiMail 6.2.x: Upgrade to version 6.2.5 or later
- For FortiMail 6.4.0: Upgrade to version 6.4.1 or later
- After upgrade, verify the new version: 'get system status'
- Consider implementing rate limiting on the management interface as an additional defense-in-depth measure
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-29056 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-29056 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data