CVE-2022-29061
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] in Fortinet FortiSOAR before 7.2.1 allows an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP GET requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortiSOAR before version 7.2.1 contains an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) where authenticated attackers can execute arbitrary operating system commands via specially crafted HTTP GET requests. The vulnerability requires valid authentication but allows complete compromise of the underlying system once exploited.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.4.1, <= 6.4.4>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.3= 7.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiSOAR installation and versionLog into the FortiSOAR web UI and navigate to the Settings or About page to view the product version. Alternatively, access the server via SSH and run: dpkg -l | grep fortisoar or check /opt/fsr.VERSION if the file exists.Affected if The installed version matches any of these ranges: 6.4.1 through 6.4.4, 7.0.0 through 7.0.2, or exactly 7.2.0
-
Verify web interface is accessibleConfirm that the FortiSOAR web interface (HTTPS on port 443 or custom port) is reachable from a network perspective. Check firewall rules and service status with: systemctl status nginx or check which ports are listening with netstat -tlnp.Affected if The web interface is exposed and the version falls within the affected ranges listed above
-
Confirm authentication is enabledVerify that FortiSOAR requires valid credentials for access. Check the authentication configuration in the Admin settings or verify that login is required by attempting an unauthenticated request which should be rejected.Affected if Valid authentication is required (as expected) and the version is affected - the vulnerability allows command execution AFTER authentication
If FortiSOAR version is 6.4.1-6.4.4, 7.0.0-7.0.2, or exactly 7.2.0 AND the web interface is accessible, the environment is affected by this command injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.0.3
Upgrade FortiSOAR to version 7.2.1 or later to patch the command injection vulnerability. As a SOAR platform handles critical security operations, ensure the upgrade is thoroughly tested in a non-production environment before deployment.
FortiSOAR 7.2.1 or later (for affected 6.4.x and 7.0.x versions, upgrade to 7.2.1 or later)
- 1. Identify the current FortiSOAR version by navigating to the Adminstration > System Settings > About page in the FortiSOAR console
- 2. If running version 6.4.1 through 6.4.4, or 7.0.0 through 7.0.2, or exactly 7.2.0, plan for an upgrade to version 7.2.1 or later
- 3. Before upgrading, create a complete backup of the FortiSOAR database and configuration
- 4. Download FortiSOAR version 7.2.1 or the latest stable version from the Fortinet Customer Support Portal
- 5. Review the FortiSOAR upgrade guide for your current version to ensure all prerequisites are met
- 6. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades may require downtime
- 7. Execute the upgrade following Fortinet's official upgrade procedure
- 8. After upgrade completion, verify the new version is 7.2.1 or later in Administration > System Settings > About
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-29061 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-29061 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data