CVE-2022-29062
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple relative path traversal vulnerabilities [CWE-23] in Fortinet FortiSOAR before 7.2.1 allows an authenticated attacker to write to the underlying filesystem with nginx permissions via crafted HTTP requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortiSOAR before version 7.2.1 contains multiple path traversal vulnerabilities (CWE-23) that allow authenticated attackers to write files to arbitrary locations on the filesystem via crafted HTTP requests containing '../' sequences. The attack succeeds with nginx user permissions, limiting the scope of writable locations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.3= 7.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed FortiSOAR versionCheck the FortiSOAR UI under System Administration > Settings > About, or use the command line: 'csadm --info' or check version file in the FortiSOAR installation directoryAffected if The version displayed is 7.0.0 through 7.0.2, or exactly 7.2.0
-
Confirm version is in affected rangeCompare your installed version against the affected ranges: 7.0.0 <= version < 7.0.3 OR version == 7.2.0Affected if Your installed version falls within 7.0.0-7.0.2 or is exactly 7.2.0
-
Verify nginx user access controlsCheck the nginx configuration file (typically /etc/nginx/nginx.conf or within /etc/nginx/conf.d/) and review the user directive. Also verify file permissions on directories that nginx can write toAffected if The nginx user has write access to sensitive system directories beyond the intended FortiSOAR data directories
-
Audit for unexpected file creationsReview web server logs for any requests containing '../' sequences in path parameters. Check for new files in system directories (/tmp, /var, /etc) that were created around the time of suspicious activityAffected if Log analysis reveals requests with '../' traversal sequences or unexpected files appear in system directories outside FortiSOAR's intended data paths
You are affected if your FortiSOAR installation is version 7.0.0-7.0.2 or exactly 7.2.0 and the nginx user has write access beyond intended application directories.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.0.3
Upgrade FortiSOAR to version 7.2.1 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, implement strict input validation on all file path parameters to reject sequences containing directory traversal characters and restrict nginx user permissions to minimal necessary directories.
FortiSOAR 7.2.1 or later
- 1. Identify the current FortiSOAR version by navigating to the FortiSOAR UI and checking the system information, or by running the appropriate CLI command.
- 2. Create a complete backup of the FortiSOAR database and configuration following Fortinet's documented backup procedures.
- 3. Download FortiSOAR version 7.2.1 or later from the Fortinet Support Portal (https://support.fortinet.com).
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades may require system downtime.
- 5. Apply the upgrade by following Fortinet's official FortiSOAR upgrade guide, typically involving accessing the FortiSOAR administration interface and importing the upgrade package.
- 6. After the upgrade completes, verify the new version by checking the system information in the FortiSOAR UI.
- 7. Validate that the path traversal vulnerability is resolved by confirming the fix is applied and testing that relative path traversal attempts are properly sanitized/blocked.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-29062 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-29062 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data