CVE-2022-29414
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple (13x) Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in WPKube's Subscribe To Comments Reloaded plugin <= 211130 on WordPress allows attackers to clean up Log archive, download system info file, plugin system settings, plugin options settings, generate a new key, reset all options, change notifications settings, management page settings, comment form settings, manage subscriptions > mass update settings, manage subscriptions > add a new subscription, update subscription, delete Subscription.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Subscribe To Comments Reloaded WordPress plugin <= version 211130 lacks proper anti-CSRF token validation on 13 different administrative action endpoints. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into unknowingly executing configuration changes (plugin settings, notifications, comment form settings), subscription management (add/update/delete subscriptions, mass updates), and system operations (reset options, generate keys, download system info, clean logs) by forcing their browser to send malicious requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 211130CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify plugin versionNavigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins > Installed Plugins and locate 'Subscribe To Comments Reloaded' or check the plugin header comment in the main PHP file (usually stcr-plugin.php or subscribe-to-comments-reloaded.php)Affected if The installed version is 211130 or any version number lower than 211130 (e.g., 211115, 210900)
-
Inspect admin action files for nonce validationExamine the main plugin PHP file and any admin-related PHP files for the presence of wp_verify_nonce or wp_create_nonce function calls around state-changing code (POST/GET handlers for settings, subscriptions, system operations)Affected if The code handling administrative actions (settings changes, subscription management, system operations) lacks wp_verify_nonce or check_admin_referer calls
-
Check plugin settings page accessibilityAttempt to access the plugin's admin settings page via WordPress admin panel and inspect the HTML forms for hidden nonce fieldsAffected if The plugin settings forms (comment form settings, notification settings, subscription management) do not contain wp_nonce_field generated nonce inputs
-
Review endpoint request handlingUse browser developer tools or a proxy to observe HTTP requests when saving plugin settings or performing subscription actions; check if requests include a '_wpnonce' or similar token parameterAffected if Administrative actions (adding/updating/deleting subscriptions, modifying settings, resetting options) can be performed without a valid nonce token in the request
You are affected if the Subscribe To Comments Reloaded plugin version is 211130 or lower AND administrative actions can be executed without requiring a valid WordPress nonce token.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement WordPress nonces (wp_verify_nonce and wp_create_nonce) on all state-changing POST/GET requests, including proper referer/origin validation, across all 13 affected endpoints.
Version 221025 or later (any version after 211130 that contains the security fix)
- Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Find "Subscribe To Comments Reloaded" in the plugin list
- If an update is available, click "Update Now" to update to the latest version
- Alternatively, you can manually download the latest version from wordpress.org/plugins/subscribe-to-comments-reloaded/ and upload it via Plugins > Add New > Upload Plugin
- After updating, verify the plugin is working correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,904.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-29414 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-29414 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data