CVE-2022-29507
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInsufficiently protected credentials in the Intel(R) Team Blue mobile application in all versions may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Intel Team Blue mobile application stores credentials (passwords, API keys, tokens, or similar secrets) in an insecure manner. An authenticated user with local access to the device can retrieve these insufficiently protected credentials, leading to information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Intel Team Blue app is installedCheck device application list for 'Intel Team Blue' or 'Team Blue' and verify it is the Intel mobile applicationAffected if The Intel Team Blue mobile application is present on the device
-
Identify app data storage locationOn Android: examine /data/data/com.intel.teamblue/ or equivalent package directory; On iOS: examine the app sandbox containerAffected if App data directory exists and contains the application files
-
Inspect shared preferences or plist files for credentialsOn Android: review shared_prefs/*.xml files; On iOS: review *.plist files in the app sandbox for stored username/password pairs, API keys, tokens, or similar secretsAffected if Credentials or secrets are found stored in plaintext in configuration files
-
Check for unencrypted credential storage in app databases or filesExamine SQLite databases (*.db) and plain text files in the app data directory for any stored passwords, API keys, tokens, or authentication tokensAffected if Sensitive credentials are stored in unencrypted databases or text files accessible to the app
-
Verify credential protection mechanismsCheck whether stored credentials are encrypted, hashed, or protected using platform-native secure storage (Android Keystore/iOS Keychain) versus stored in plaintext or weakly protected formatsAffected if Credentials are stored without encryption or proper protection mechanisms
If the Intel Team Blue app is installed and credentials are found stored in plaintext or in unencrypted storage locations without platform-native protection, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement platform-native secure credential storage mechanisms (Android Keystore, iOS Keychain) or proper encryption for storing sensitive credentials; avoid storing credentials in plaintext, shared preferences, or unencrypted files.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-29507 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-29507 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data