CVE-2022-29618
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDue to insufficient input validation, SAP NetWeaver Development Infrastructure (Design Time Repository) - versions 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, allows an unauthenticated attacker to inject script into the URL and execute code in the user’s browser. On successful exploitation, an attacker can view or modify information causing a limited impact on confidentiality and integrity of the application.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver Development Infrastructure's Design Time Repository component. Due to insufficient input validation, unauthenticated attackers can inject malicious JavaScript into URLs, which executes in victim users' browsers when they access the crafted URL.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.30= 7.31= 7.40= 7.50CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the SAP NetWeaver Development Infrastructure versionExecute the SAP kernel version check command: 'sapcontrol -nr <instance_number> -function GetVersion' or check the SAP Note 1718410 for version identification methods. Alternatively, check the 'sapkernel<exe>' version in the /sapmnt/<SID>/exe directory.Affected if The installed version matches 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, or 7.50 exactly.
-
Confirm Design Time Repository component is enabledAccess the DTR web interface by navigating to the SAP NetWeaver Administration (NWA) or DTR URL endpoint. Typically found at: http://<host>:<port>/dtr or through the SAP NetWeaver Developer Studio connection.Affected if The Design Time Repository web interface is accessible without authentication.
-
Verify the DTR URL parameters are exposedInspect the DTR web application's URL structure by logging into the DTR interface and observing how parameters are passed in the browser address bar (e.g., navigation links, search parameters).Affected if URL parameters are visible in the browser address bar and can be manipulated without immediate validation errors.
-
Check for existing input validationReview any reverse proxy, SAP Web Dispatcher, or application-level configurations that may handle URL parameter validation. Check the SAP Web Dispatcher configuration file (sapwebdisp.pfl) for URL filtering rules.Affected if No input validation filters are configured for the DTR endpoint and the component is publicly or semi-publicly accessible.
You are affected if your SAP NetWeaver Development Infrastructure version is exactly 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, or 7.50 AND the Design Time Repository web interface is accessible and processes URL parameters without sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the relevant SAP security note/patch for CVE-2022-29618. Implement proper input validation and output encoding for all URL parameters to prevent script injection.
- Access the SAP Support Portal at launchpad.support.sap.com
- Search for Security Note related to CVE-2022-29618 or SAP NetWeaver Development Infrastructure XSS vulnerability
- Download and review the applicable SAP Security Note
- Apply the security patch or correction as detailed in the SAP Security Note
- Verify the patch has been applied successfully by checking the system version or through appropriate testing
- Clear browser cache and test the affected URL parameter to confirm the XSS vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-29618 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-29618 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data