CVE-2022-29656
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWedding Management System v1.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the id parameter at /Wedding-Management/package_detail.php.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Wedding Management System v1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands through the unsanitized id parameter in package_detail.php. The CVSS 9.8 indicates unauthenticated exploitation with potential for full database compromise and possibly remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Wedding Management System versionCheck the installed version of the Wedding Management System on your server. This may be in a version file, about page, or documentation. Compare it to version 1.0.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0 (Wedding Management System v1.0)
-
Locate package_detail.phpSearch the web root directory for the file named package_detail.php. This file is typically in the main application directory or a modules folder.Affected if The file package_detail.php exists in the application directory
-
Inspect the id parameter handlingOpen package_detail.php and examine how the id parameter is processed. Look for SQL queries that include the id parameter without visible sanitization or use of prepared statements.Affected if The id parameter from GET or POST requests is directly inserted into SQL queries without sanitization or parameterized queries
-
Check application accessibilityVerify that package_detail.php is accessible via the web server. Attempt to access it through a browser request (e.g., GET /package_detail.php?id=1).Affected if The file is accessible over the network and accepts user input through the id parameter
You are affected if you are running Wedding Management System v1.0 and the package_detail.php file exists with an unprotected id parameter handling SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements for all user inputs, especially the id parameter in package_detail.php. Conduct a full code audit to identify and remediate similar injection points across the application.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-29656 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-29656 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data